Why "Three Months" ?

[Eighthman]

Hillary is Nixon in drag but without his bold opportunism.  I think we are one recession away from riots and breakdown of major cities.  There can be no question that several states will go bankrupt, fashioned one way or another (Illinois, for example)

To me the key is that there needs to be some obstacle created to prevent WW3 until the US Empire dies of natural causes.  How many US politicians know about a 15 point plan in the Kremlin to defeat the US, once and for all (Sergei Glazyev).? Like the old empires of Europe, we will be far better off as a republic than an empire, wasting resources being the world's policeman. 

[space otter]

No there are NOT  We either vote Trump in and take our chances or we let them put Hillary in and we are all screwed

There is no other choice because Americans are too stupid and apathetic to EVER do anything about it

zorgon   you're not even a u.s. citizen  you're here on a green card

please erase my membership

wishing you all a good rest of your life

[rdunk]

No there are NOT  We either vote Trump in and take our chances or we let them put Hillary in and we are all screwed

Yes, that is an absolute and irrefutable fact of the 2 present candidates!! Hillary's past actions and her promises for the future, if elected, make such terrible results very clear. Trump is "promising" to try to deal with many of the very serious issues with which this country now faces, and to deal with them in a way that is good for we the people and for our country - from border walls to building back our military! Hillary is pretty much inept, while Trump is a very successful CEO/owner of multiple private significant business ventures.

We know what we will have with Hillary, and that is a totally untenable circumstance for this country!!! Trump on the other hand "could be" (??) one of the better Presidents ever for our country. And even if not at the better level, he will still be so far beyond better than Hillary there is absolutely no question of who deserves our vote in November!!

And with that said, I am was and still am a Cruz guy! But, in voting, we should do what we need to do for this country, for us, and for the future of our kids and grandkids - TRUMP ALL THE WAY!!

[Eighthman]

https://www.independentsentinel.com/lest-we-forget-hillarys-china-gate-scandal/

Ho-hum....yet another scandal from the Clintons, now forgotten, buried amidst countless other outrages.

Since foreign governments can purchase politicians, just like corporations, could US warmaking be restrained by this legalized bribery?  Maybe Russia should just come up with the money and live in peace.

[Pimander]

No there are NOT  We either vote Trump in and take our chances or we let them put Hillary in and we are all screwed

Good luck with that lol

If you want a liar who doesn't even agree with your constitution as President then your Nation deserves one.

[space otter]

there are none so blind as those who refuse to see






The New York Times The New York Times
By WILLIAM J. BROAD and DAVID E. SANGER
11 hrs ago

Before having a rally in South Carolina, Mrs. Clinton campaigned in Fairfield, Ala.
Analysis: A meaningful shift in Trump-Clinton race may be at hand
Workers put the final touches on a natural gas well platform owned by Encana south of Parachute, Colorado, December 8, 2014. The economy of Parachute, with a current population of approximately 1000 people, was devastated when thousands of workers lost their jobs on "Black Sunday" in 1982, after Exxon terminated the Colony Shale Oil Project. The current rise of hydraulic fracking in natural gas retrieval has given a cautious hope to the town's inhabitants, who know that market demand brings both boom and bust. Picture taken December 8, 2014. REUTERS/Jim Urquhart (UNITED STATES - Tags: ENERGY BUSINESS EMPLOYMENT)
Job growth soundly exceeds forecasts in July
Hillary Clinton has fueled a debate over whether her rival for the presidency, Donald J. Trump, is fit to command America's atomic forces. "Imagine him in the Oval Office facing a real crisis," she said in her address at the Democratic convention last week. "A man you can bait with a tweet is not a man we can trust with nuclear weapons."

This portrayal has become such an issue in the campaign that President Obama was asked about it at a news conference on Thursday, where he echoed Mrs. Clinton's concerns. Her charge raises a question: Is there any check on a president's power to launch nuclear arms that could destroy entire cities or nations?



The short answer is no, though history suggests that in practice, there may be ways to slow down or even derail the decision-making process. No one disputes, however, that the president has an awesome authority.

If the United States appeared to be under nuclear assault, the president would have minutes to decide whether the threat was real, and to fire as many as 925 nuclear warheads with a destructive force greater than 17,000 Hiroshima bombs, according to estimates by Hans M. Kristensen, the director of the Nuclear Information Project at the Federation of American Scientists, a private group in Washington.
Modify messageReport to moderator    1

[Eighthman]

Trump's volatility is obvious.  Hillary is dangerous and the corrupt media don't report it.

http://www.govtslaves.info/the-truth-about-hillarys-bizarre-behavior/

[burntheships]

The US has had Skull & Bones members in power longer than I can remember. It doesn't matter if you had a person up there that was completely sane and would do only good things for the country they would still probably lose by a narrow margin because that is what the predetermined outcome is programmed into the voting machines. BAN THE MACHINES!!!

Agreed, even with DHS looking over it now supposedly,
this is not a secure mechanics for recording votes.

To easy to program with a small percentage of flip,
or hacking vulnerabilities.

[Eighthman]

Is there any possibility that intelligence people/old style military types could swing the election for Trump?

[ArMaP]

Is there any possibility that intelligence people/old style military types could swing the election for Trump?

Why?

[funbox]

Why?

cause she's the devil ?



funbox

[Eighthman]

WHY?  Oh, gee, I don't know....

a gay, transgendered military

endless expensive, pointless wars that the US is losing

Saudi Arabia gets away with 9/11 as if it was a minor, irrelevant event

some people may be familiar with world history in which overextended empires collapse

[Pimander]

endless expensive, pointless wars that the US is losing

Trump?  Can bait him with a tweet? 

[ArMaP]

WHY?  Oh, gee, I don't know....

a gay, transgendered military

endless expensive, pointless wars that the US is losing

Saudi Arabia gets away with 9/11 as if it was a minor, irrelevant event

some people may be familiar with world history in which overextended empires collapse

Sorry, but your explanation didn't make things clearer for me.

[Dyna]

Good luck with that lol

If you want a liar who doesn't even agree with your constitution as President then your Nation deserves one.

I very seriously doubt that voters put anyone in office now days. The whole show is nothing but that they have already made their choices.