Beware of this Youtube Issue.

[astr0144]

Beware of Youtube issues..

I have not as yet checked all this out...but !....

This was just posted from another Conspiracy person who I follow..who is connected to Ex mi6..

Seems that Youtube is now monitoring us more indepth.. or maybe they just do so to targeted individuals...

                     ----------------------
YouTube My entire Account has been de-Monetised!
But Guess what... I can RE-Monetise it..but guess what.. I cannot: IF:-
BANNED Subjects

Death of M. S ..(Someone he knew who recently was said to have died under very suspicious circumstances, maybe by Snake and Scorpion venum....which he has also claimed was to have been targeted by someone.. 2 weeks ago but survived. while on a plane ! Evidence of the venum was found on something that he has touched that somehow effected him badly...Very strange situation !

....Cannot Monetise

Anything on Dr Judy Wood & How the Towers fell on 9-11...........................................................................Cannot Monetise
Anything on the Falklands War and the Black Goo..Cannot Monetise
The Murder of Dr David Kelly ...................................Cannot Monetise
Sandra Fecht interviews on Satanic Abuse............Cannot Monetise
Entire sound track of the Iris Era Muted Censoring the documentary on the  Pirate stations. My Original Work Censored by YouTube
The entire film Wavelength by Declan Lowney on Big D Radio....MUTED!
This is the End of the internet
We cannot Discuss Dr Judy Wood..... Its ILLEGAL to 'Monetise. that!

[ArMaP]

Not really new information, you can read about it here.

Basically, any "controversial or sensitive subjects and events" may not be allowed to be monetised.

If they are so worried about monetising their videos I suppose they're not that interested in "spreading the truth" after all.

[astr0144]

Thanks for the info/link ArMaP..

I am not sure how long ago that info came in or has been applied...

it seems strange as the person/s I refer to have had youtube vids posted for some time that I am sure are not in favor to what I think that I understand Youtubes guidelines suggest.

So I wonder why it only seems to have applied to his material now !  Unless they take time to find it..
when past material had already been posted prior to their new rules.

In ref to monitoring their videos or not being interested in spreading the  truth ?

I can only suggest that truth may not really be known.. but in some cases... it maybe that those who post certain videos may have some valid truthful content.. or it may not be or it is of ones opinion..
or unknown for sure on either side..

but if youtube are now taken over by google and it is Government or ran by the NWO or PTB.. then it maybe that they will not allow anything that they may not like being posted...

If the PTB or who ever are the Good guys then it would be good not to allow anyone who is misleading the public to post anything that maybe seen as disinfo..

but who do we trust ?

some conspiracy videos may or may not be showing truthful material  to the public ?

Like google.. it took time but it did used to allow many misleading articles and advertising on its search engines... but later did do quite a good job in monitoring and only allowing certain content to be allowed..

are they now doing the same with youtube ?

This is a copy of youtubes / googles guidelines..for posting video content on youtube...

Advertiser-friendly content guidelines
Advertiser-friendly content is content that's appropriate for all audiences. It has little to no inappropriate or mature content in the video stream, thumbnail, or metadata (such as in the video title). If the video does contain inappropriate content, the context is usually newsworthy or comedic and the creator's intent is to inform or entertain (not offend or shock).

Content that may be acceptable for YouTube under YouTube policies may not be appropriate for Google advertising. Google's program policies provide additional guidelines for what can be monetized, and advertisers also have their own standards and requirements for content.
Content that is considered inappropriate for advertising
Content that is considered "not advertiser-friendly" includes, but is not limited to:

Sexually suggestive content, including partial nudity and sexual humor
Violence, including display of serious injury and events related to violent extremism
Inappropriate language, including harassment, profanity and vulgar language
Promotion of drugs and regulated substances, including selling, use and abuse of such items
Controversial or sensitive subjects and events, including subjects related to war, political conflicts, natural disasters and tragedies, even if graphic imagery is not shown
If any of the above describes any portion of your video, then the video may not be approved for monetization. If monetization is approved, your video may not be eligible for all available ad formats. YouTube reserves the right to not monetize a video, as well as suspend monetization features on channels that repeatedly submit videos violating our policies. 

Not really new information, you can read about it here.

Basically, any "controversial or sensitive subjects and events" may not be allowed to be monetised.

If they are so worried about monetising their videos I suppose they're not that interested in "spreading the truth" after all.

Can I ask if you can clarify more what you mean in your statement ?

Are you suggesting Youtube are concerned that they dont want to allow truth be shown on their videos..

In youtubes case I dont think they would care either way.. unless they are connected with some means that they want to cover certain things up..or just stop what they see as misleading or outrageous content being posted..

or are you indicating that they may think that the  Conspiracists who post their material are maybe posting misleading info that the public should not have to see ?

If they are so worried about monetising their videos I suppose they're not that interested in "spreading the truth" after all.

[ArMaP]

What I meant was that if people are worried with spreading the truth with their videos then why do they care about making money with their YouTube videos or not?

As a YouTube member in "good standing" I can monetise my videos, but I choose no to do it because it only gets the member good money when the videos are viewed by many thousands and because I would need to give YouTube (or Google, as it looks like Google is the one taking care of the advertising, as expected) more information about myself, and I'm not interested.

So, those people complaining about not getting their money appear to be more worried about the lack of the income than about the "spread of truth" they were supposedly doing.

Too long, didn't read version: those YouTube members are in it for the money, they couldn't care less about the "message" on their videos.

PS: to make it clear, what we are talking about here is what Google accepts as topics that may get advertisements related to them, not about what YouTube (part of Google) accepts. As Google is making money on those adverts, to me, it looks like the advertisers are not interested in those topics (or may even be against those topics) and so may take their adverts from Google and go elsewhere. Google is big but it's not the only one.

Edited to add that I think this come out at the start of the year, as I think I got some email about it, but I'm not sure. As I delete those emails I can't confirm it.

[astr0144]

I may have to rewrite this reply...if on my quick browse at your reply is not relevant in my reply.

I now think I understand more what you were referring to.

But initially did think that you were either more indicating maybe that Youtube did not want to let say Conspiracy theorists post their video versions of what they think is truth.... as maybe Youtube / Google are trying to cover up the possible truths if say they are working in connection with some Elites or Governments / CIA as many suggest..

Or I thought that maybe you were sticking up for those who post Conpiracy topics as they maybe trying to expose the truth about various topics.. and youtube are now trying to stop them and not allowing them to make their video posts..

I never thought about any money or advertising !

I am aware more these days many videos now contain adverts and no doubt some people are making money.

BUT the Main Conspiracy guy that I post his related  material has been doing his stuff for many years for free...and i am not aware he has been aiming to profit from it in the past....

BUT admittedly recently.. he has made suggestions that why does he do all this for free ?

maybe he has got someways of making money in the videos he posts..be it people paying him to carry adverts on his videos.. or maybe google pay him for every hit he gets on his videos..

as at one time you could run whats known as adwords.. small ads on ones websites that if someone clicked on the ads.. you got paid if you had signed up to googles adwords program..

so maybe you are right..

and yes I also dont like having to give google or similar other types of services (yahoo as another eg) my personal details..

I just tried to set up a new yahoo email account and it will only accept a valid mobile phone number to send me an access code....HOW wrong is that !!! why do I need to give them my mobile number ?
I did try a false and old one but it would not accept as it needs to send out a access code..Why cannot it do that to another email address ?

Although some mobiles can be unregistered with ones name and address etc if just a pay as you go..

so I may now see your point..

But after all that .. I am not sure that would be relevant to what he has initially suggested...

that he has had some of his videos removed...or prevented from being payed on his youtube channel.

yes he maybe loosing income and would youtube want to stop income being made if they were getting a large following that they also make money on..

I think he was just concerned as they stopped his videos being viewed on what he sees as important topics...in ref to being against the NWO...or that type of thing...

but maybe what you say is his real motive.. that I had not considered.

Im not sure video hits make much money per hit and unless you get 1000s of hits... its not really going to earn one much... maybe a few £$s a month..on average..

[ArMaP]

But initially did think that you were either more indicating maybe that Youtube did not want to let say Conspiracy theorists post their video versions of what they think is truth.... as maybe Youtube / Google are trying to cover up the possible truths if say they are working in connection with some Elites or Governments / CIA as many suggest..

YouTube only cares about hits, and from that point of view, the more controversial the better.

I never thought about any money or advertising !

This is all about money, as you can see in the text you posted in the opening post:

YouTube My entire Account has been de-Monetised!
But Guess what... I can RE-Monetise it..but guess what.. I cannot: IF:-
BANNED Subjects

Death of M. S ..(Someone he knew who recently was said to have died under very suspicious circumstances, maybe by Snake and Scorpion venum....which he has also claimed was to have been targeted by someone.. 2 weeks ago but survived. while on a plane ! Evidence of the venum was found on something that he has touched that somehow effected him badly...Very strange situation !

....Cannot Monetise

Anything on Dr Judy Wood & How the Towers fell on 9-11...........................................................................Cannot Monetise
Anything on the Falklands War and the Black Goo..Cannot Monetise
The Murder of Dr David Kelly ...................................Cannot Monetise
Sandra Fecht interviews on Satanic Abuse............Cannot Monetise
Entire sound track of the Iris Era Muted Censoring the documentary on the  Pirate stations. My Original Work Censored by YouTube
The entire film Wavelength by Declan Lowney on Big D Radio....MUTED!
This is the End of the internet
We cannot Discuss Dr Judy Wood..... Its ILLEGAL to 'Monetise. that!

All the complaints are either about not being able to monetise or about what sounds like copyright issues (using someone else's soundtrack has always resulted, at least, in not being able to get money from the video, I once got a warning like that, when a video I made had the sound of my radio playing in the background (I always have the radio on) and YouTube detected the music that was playing and told me I couldn't monetise the video because of that).

I am aware more these days many videos now contain adverts and no doubt some people are making money.

Almost all videos have that small banner at the bottom that only disappears after some seconds. Some videos also have adverts on the page, to the right of the video.

maybe he has got someways of making money in the videos he posts..be it people paying him to carry adverts on his videos.. or maybe google pay him for every hit he gets on his videos..

It's Google that controls the adverts on YouTube. For him to get money from the videos he needs to have a AdSense account associated with his account. As far as I understand it, ads at the bottom of the video or at the right on the YouTube page are controlled by Google, ads that play before we can watch the video are controlled by him.

as at one time you could run whats known as adwords.. small ads on ones websites that if someone clicked on the ads.. you got paid if you had signed up to googles adwords program..

Yes, that's a similar method.

But after all that .. I am not sure that would be relevant to what he has initially suggested...

that he has had some of his videos removed...or prevented from being payed on his youtube channel.

Not removed, prevented from making money from them. You can see if he still has those videos on YouTube or not.

yes he maybe loosing income and would youtube want to stop income being made if they were getting a large following that they also make money on..

If he makes money with the ads then YouTube is also making money with them, as they act as a kind of agent. YouTube has many statistics, so they know exactly what the advertisers want to associate with their products and what they do not want, and, to make it this way, I suppose YouTube saw that they were losing money (or they were losing the possibility of making money) with those topics, so videos with those topics cannot be monetised.

I think he was just concerned as they stopped his videos being viewed on what he sees as important topics...in ref to being against the NWO...or that type of thing...

Not from being viewed, but you can see if he has those videos up or not. As I don't know who he is I cannot do it.

but maybe what you say is his real motive.. that I had not considered.

Im not sure video hits make much money per hit and unless you get 1000s of hits... its not really going to earn one much... maybe a few £$s a month..on average..

Yes, you need to have thousands of views per day to get some good money from your videos, but the video with the most views I have on my channel (not a video I made, a video I converted and uploaded to YouTube, as many people were complaining that they couldn't watch it) has a total of 342,763 views, but has it took 9 years to reach those numbers I wouldn't get a thing if I had it monetised.

YouTube analytics show all that to the channel owner, including the countries with most views, gender of the viewer, etc., so people know exactly what videos make them money or not.

[astr0144]

As I initially indicated for some reason " I had not considered Money being part of the issue "...

Some words are not my strengths ! I am not a very good wordsmith...

and somehow did not associate with the word De or "Monetise"... I think I was thinking he was suggesting it had been deactivated and maybe for the reasons that I indicated...ie Govt connected Concerns over conspiracy truths...

YouTube only cares about hits, and from that point of view, the more controversial the better.

But yes I know see what you have highlighted ..
"Monetise " and that it refers to the video making money..

This is all about money, as you can see in the text you posted in the opening post:

Interesting what you say about your youtube experience and the Radio issue ! 

Had you or have you created many videos for youtube yourself from scratch or maybe re edited others uploaded videos.. and if so was you trying to monetise them for income ?

If so is it worth the effort ?

I once looked into some biz idea on how to advertise on youtube using some special software..in youtubes earlier days... to promote a websites product..
Some marketers I believe made a lot of money with it..  but not long after I obtained it.. youtube made changes that made the software invalid ! 

there are probably some new software that still allows you to make good money..but i lost keeping up with  the experts trying to do it..after some incident took me away from it..and maybe running out of money. as it was not cheap ! 

All the complaints are either about not being able to monetise or about what sounds like copyright issues (using someone else's soundtrack has always resulted, at least, in not being able to get money from the video, I once got a warning like that, when a video I made had the sound of my radio playing in the background (I always have the radio on) and YouTube detected the music that was playing and told me I couldn't monetise the video because of that).

Yes.. I know what you mean. I think !

Almost all videos have that small banner at the bottom that only disappears after some seconds. Some videos also have adverts on the page, to the right of the video.

Sorry I think I referred to adwords, But I meant adsence !..

At one time adsence was a very easy way to make money on the internet... I have come across some marketers who made a Million using it.. but later lost all their websites and income when google made changes.... a very painful experience for them.. but at least that had made their fortunes prior.. but was unable to maintain a regular monthly income from their websites carrying adsence ads.. some had 1000s of websites.. carrying adsence ads..

you can still make money with adsence but the returns are now much less and its too time consuming or if you try to pay to promote.. it is unlikely to cover the advertising costs..

It's Google that controls the adverts on YouTube. For him to get money from the videos he needs to have a AdSense account associated with his account. As far as I understand it, ads at the bottom of the video or at the right on the YouTube page are controlled by Google, ads that play before we can watch the video are controlled by him.

I can try and check..

Not removed, prevented from making money from them. You can see if he still has those videos on YouTube or not.

I am not really sure if the videos where not making money.. that youtube need to demonetise the vids..
unless its costing them money to leave them classed as monetised..which I dont fully understand how it works.

If he makes money with the ads then YouTube is also making money with them, as they act as a kind of agent. YouTube has many statistics, so they know exactly what the advertisers want to associate with their products and what they do not want, and, to make it this way, I suppose YouTube saw that they were losing money (or they were losing the possibility of making money) with those topics, so videos with those topics cannot be monetised.

I can try to check them...

Initially I am posting some of his and his associates material to get some idea if anyone finds it of interest... or if there maybe concerns of his material...
as I am trying to determine if somethings he refers to maybe legit or B.S.. Its just that he covers some topics that interest me that I may like to know more about..some being what some may say could be extreme claims..

He certainly has covered things for maybe over 20 years.. as have several conspiracy or UFO researchers... he has posted some stuff that since me being on PRC has possibly been considered as B.S.. but other things he posts may not have been discussed much on PRC...and he seems to have obtained a lot of interesting contacts and followers.
Also some of the things he researches may become connected in interesting ways..that makes me wonder if some of the things he has suggested may have truths...

I am rather sceptical about his Mi6 contact. but I find some of the things he talks about interesting !..

and even if what he  is saying is disinfo or B.S... That also interests me.. as by if he is doing it to mislead.. what is his motives ? what may he be trying to cover up.

Not from being viewed, but you can see if he has those videos up or not. As I don't know who he is I cannot do it.

but maybe what you say is his real motive.. that I had not considered.

Yes, you need to have thousands of views per day to get some good money from your videos, but the video with the most views I have on my channel (not a video I made, a video I converted and uploaded to YouTube, as many people were complaining that they couldn't watch it) has a total of 342,763 views, but has it took 9 years to reach those numbers I wouldn't get a thing if I had it monetised.

YouTube analytics show all that to the channel owner, including the countries with most views, gender of the viewer, etc., so people know exactly what videos make them money or not.

[ArMaP]

Had you or have you created many videos for youtube yourself from scratch or maybe re edited others uploaded videos.. and if so was you trying to monetise them for income ?

I have made only a few videos (mostly to explain what I mean in some discussion about videos) but I never monetised any.

At one time adsence was a very easy way to make money on the internet... I have come across some marketers who made a Million using it.. but later lost all their websites and income when google made changes.... a very painful experience for them.. but at least that had made their fortunes prior.. but was unable to maintain a regular monthly income from their websites carrying adsence ads.. some had 1000s of websites.. carrying adsence ads..

Google is always changing their rules and making it harder for people to make money without Google getting a large part of it, naturally.

I am not really sure if the videos where not making money.. that youtube need to demonetise the vids..
unless its costing them money to leave them classed as monetised..which I dont fully understand how it works.

My understanding of it is that Google thinks (or knows) that that type of video doesn't generate money, so they want them replaced by videos that do.

Initially I am posting some of his and his associates material to get some idea if anyone finds it of interest... or if there maybe concerns of his material...
as I am trying to determine if somethings he refers to maybe legit or B.S.. Its just that he covers some topics that interest me that I may like to know more about..some being what some may say could be extreme claims..

Sometimes, knowing that someone lies is more informative than knowing that they tell the truth.

[astr0144]

It would be good if one could create a video that got a lot of hits on some topic of interest if it was easy to do and worth ones effort and time.

It depends how one goes about it and whether they don't mind being filmed live on camera or if they consider creating say a series of screen shots with some written content with a voice over and maybe some images.

but to create a worthy good one.. I think would take some doing..

There are some video software edit programs  that one can use that may make things easier..

but I think there is an art to making one that goes viral.

I have made only a few videos (mostly to explain what I mean in some discussion about videos) but I never monetised any.

Frustrating For anyone wanting to try to make quick and easy money from them that 5 to 10 years ago ..there was some really good opportunities if one was in the know and aware how to do it.

In any marketing.. / website campaigns.. getting visitors or traffic as it is called..be it free or what some describe as cheap traffic..such as paying for adwords... was once the way to do it when you could pay pennies to get clicks to ones website from paying for cheap ads on googles search engines under what ever niche or topic key words that you wanted to target..  now the search engines are flooded with too much competition and the cost to advertise on main known keyword topics is now more like 0.50 to a $/£ a click..sometimes maybe even $10 a click or more for one visitor..

its ok if you have a good product to offer or follow up products if one can afford to get some initial prospects interested and willing to pay for an initial offer that you can later try and sell a higher priced product.

but the days of paying little to advertise online have gone..from what I am led to believe..

Google is always changing their rules and making it harder for people to make money without Google getting a large part of it, naturally.

Seems that maybe the case...if it otherwise costs them to have had some videos classed as being monetised..

My understanding of it is that Google thinks (or knows) that that type of video doesn't generate money, so they want them replaced by videos that do.

Sometimes !...

No doubt one can get some idea whether they are lying.. but someone like Mi6 maybe a trained liar and harder to tell..

it also depends obviously what one already may know or be aware (or think they do) about certain things..to try to make a judgement.

Sometimes, knowing that someone lies is more informative than knowing that they tell the truth.