Is NASA Trying To Again Hide Evidence of UFOs Near Space Station?

[rdunk]

Not much to see with this, but seemingly the astronaut tries to block what is appearing in the camera's field of view in the below video.

Here is a screenshot of one of the UFOs @ 44secs into the video:



And this screenshot is taken at 1:11secs into the video





And a news article on this subject:
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/mystery-flashing-lights-speed-past-9626551

[Irene]

I don't want to step on any expert toes here, but after watching the film I thought it was, initially, a satellite.

Later on I decided it is some kind of debris, and I don't think the astronaut was trying to cover the camera.

Okay, my shields are up. Bring it on, you Borg!   

[The Seeker]

Very hard to say anything other than it appears that whatever the 2 blips are appear to be small and moving very fast; so they could be anything; also appears the astronaut is performing a task of some sort, and as fast as the blips are moving I doubt if they were even noticed...

Seeker

[Irene]

Very hard to say anything other than it appears that whatever the 2 blips are appear to be small and moving very fast; so they could be anything; also appears the astronaut is performing a task of some sort, and as fast as the blips are moving I doubt if they were even noticed...

Seeker

There were two? I only saw one. I'm blind anyway. Were they both on the same flight path?

By the way, Cernan, last man on the moon, just died.

[Martyn Stubbs]

The individual spacewalker does block the view but the astronaut would just say that they were moving normally! And the UFO is so maybe. I hate the go pro camera. Generally NASA does not want to show UFOs, but these objects are everywhere & they are not able to be totally hidden. So they use the totally false claim that they are ice & debris...& life goes on!

[The Seeker]

The individual spacewalker does block the view but the astronaut would just say that they were moving normally! And the UFO is so maybe. I hate the go pro camera. Generally NASA does not want to show UFOs, but these objects are everywhere & they are not able to be totally hidden. So they use the totally false claim that they are ice & debris...& life goes on!

Hi Martyn, good to see you  All I have to say is that if all that stuff is ice and debris zooming by, the ISS ought to look like a swiss cheese  But hey, Never A Straight Answer makes a good dog and pony show for the sheepy peeps...

Seeker

[ArMaP]

All I have to say is that if all that stuff is ice and debris zooming by, the ISS ought to look like a swiss cheese 

Not if the ice and debris come from the ISS.

[thorfourwinds]

Not if the ice and debris come from the ISS.

So, you're inferring that the only debris in space is from the ISS? 

[ArMaP]

So, you're inferring that the only debris in space is from the ISS? 

No.

[Martyn Stubbs]

I am amazed anybody buys that ice & debris excuse. If you do any research, it is easy to debunk! I have all I need in NASA's own experiments re: debris & ice. The missions collected debris &  even melted ice...(killing OBERG'S dumb theory). On one mission a special camera was mounted on a shuttle to record the "particles"! This study used a special measurement unit (like the HERCULES) to plot distance, size & movements of this "phenomena" (not to mention a special budget for this) If dumb old me could find this, then ArMaP should have no problem.

[ArMaP]

I am amazed anybody buys that ice & debris excuse. If you do any research, it is easy to debunk! I have all I need in NASA's own experiments re: debris & ice. The missions collected debris &  even melted ice...(killing OBERG'S dumb theory). On one mission a special camera was mounted on a shuttle to record the "particles"! This study used a special measurement unit (like the HERCULES) to plot distance, size & movements of this "phenomena" (not to mention a special budget for this) If dumb old me could find this, then ArMaP should have no problem.

If you have the data why not post it?

[Pimander]

I am amazed anybody buys that ice & debris excuse. If you do any research, it is easy to debunk!

I've seen some examples that are ice (you do get a lot of ice where hydrocarbons are used as propellents).  I've also seen some UFOs that were probably black bin liners and other debris.  Those explanations don't explain every video though no matter how much confirmation bias effects debunkers.