A Reason I Received Why Electrogravitics is "Dangerous"

[Littleenki]

Nicely put PWM

"What people call 'static' electricity, is linked to very powerful forces, i see charge being a dimension in itself."

I haven't seen others express it that way.

Linda

I have thought of static electricity as a stressed reaction between dimensions, and a sort of indicator that something is holding pressure within a certain location, and when it occurs, that location comes into proximity with another similarly stressed dimension, causing the connection we actually visualize and hear.

A by-product of something else much greater.

Each spark or arc, a proof of an existing nodal point, where dimensions meet, and as Hobbit sees, these places can be sensed by dowsing, which is the ultimate finder of unseen and unmeasurable forces.

More than just rubbing the feet upon carpet.

Unless the carpet and the foot exist in two different dimensions, eh PWM?

Cheers!
Le

[SarK0Y]

According to LaViolette's subquantum kinetics (SQK), gravity is only APPARENTLY weak.  If You read My electrogravitics post You would see that it is a very strong force that, because of virtually equal numbers of positive gravity particles being (nearly) cancelled out by negative gravity particles (the positive gravity (PG) of a PG particle is ever so slightly greater than an NG particle), the NET gravity is slight and positive.  Positively charged particles have PG, negatively charged particles have NG.

By separating positive and negative particles, a gravity field is created in which matter will "fall" towards the positive particles and away from the negative.  Attach the whole to the matter "falling" and the fall drags the field along, creating perpetual movement in the positive direction.  Thus, if the positive is "up" relative to the earth, what is within this independent field will appear to have "antigravity" as it "falls" upward.

Amaterasu, aforementioned conjectures look too childish: i did put out the arguments why it so. if to say about Gravity, i recalled quite attractive theory . Looks hella good 

sarKOY I agree with you

I think charge is the culprit here.
What people call 'static' electricity, is linked to very powerful forces, i see charge being a dimension in itself.
This would explain a lot of things, IMO...

PLAYSWITHMACHINES, i so'm bored to've seen all-that  AG-prone B$ EM effects have the everything to travel up to the Moon & Beyond.

[PLAYSWITHMACHINES]

There HAS to be a link between EM and gravity.
We call it 'EG' as a sort of general description.

[SarK0Y]

There HAS to be a link between EM and gravity.
We call it 'EG' as a sort of general description.

HD - Physics will give these Links with accurate description, but too early yet  hyperdimensional prisms can convert one kind of field to another...

[Amaterasu]

Amaterasu, aforementioned conjectures look too childish: i did put out the arguments why it so. if to say about Gravity, i recalled quite attractive theory . Looks hella good 

Well, Sar, all I can say is that LaViolette took chemical reactions and applied the principles to the subquantum world.  The math works, and unlike relativity, it predicted the Biefeld-Brown Effect.  On top of that, LaViolette had never HEARD of the BBE (or TT Brown) when He got the predictions, thinking there was something wrong with His model until He encountered TT Brown and the BBE.

So...  Point to wacky theories all Ya want...SQK predicts EVERYTHING both of Einstein's theories predicts AND much more that is TESTABLE.

You might want to actually check it out.  [smile]

[Mikado]

Well, Sar, all I can say is that LaViolette took chemical reactions and applied the principles to the subquantum world.  The math works, and unlike relativity, it predicted the Biefeld-Brown Effect.  On top of that, LaViolette had never HEARD of the BBE (or TT Brown) when He got the predictions, thinking there was something wrong with His model until He encountered TT Brown and the BBE.

So...  Point to wacky theories all Ya want...SQK predicts EVERYTHING both of Einstein's theories predicts AND much more that is TESTABLE.

You might want to actually check it out.  [smile]

Are you sure about that fact in that LaViolette never heard of Brown? I have heard differently but then, that is how the rumor mill seems to work. Just wondering if you could reference that .

Mikado

[Amaterasu]

Granted, Mikado, I take Him at His word in Secrets of Antigravity Propulsion.  Yes, I am certain He has made that claim.  What is there to suggest He was...embellishing the truth?

The man has been gracious to answer the questions I have posed.  He seems to be on the up and up.  Truly certain that SQK - if not THE perfect model, is one hell of a lot closer than relativity.  Have You read Secrets?  (Or Subquantum Kinetics...?)

[SarK0Y]

Well, Sar, all I can say is that LaViolette took chemical reactions and applied the principles to the subquantum world.  The math works, and unlike relativity, it predicted the Biefeld-Brown Effect.  On top of that, LaViolette had never HEARD of the BBE (or TT Brown) when He got the predictions, thinking there was something wrong with His model until He encountered TT Brown and the BBE.

So...  Point to wacky theories all Ya want...SQK predicts EVERYTHING both of Einstein's theories predicts AND much more that is TESTABLE.

You might want to actually check it out.  [smile]

Amaterasu, i damned don't understand how Neutron got zero mass the EVERYTHING means that all stuff about Atomic Masses, Relativistic speeds & so forth is Just B$ $tory. + mass of Proton is Just slightly greater than of Electron, right?   

[PLAYSWITHMACHINES]

From what i remember from high school, the proton has about 1,870 times the mass of an electron, yet they carry equal amounts of charge.

The question is: How much energy can you put into an electron, and how much can you remove?........

[Mikado]

Granted, Mikado, I take Him at His word in Secrets of Antigravity Propulsion.  Yes, I am certain He has made that claim.  What is there to suggest He was...embellishing the truth?

The man has been gracious to answer the questions I have posed.  He seems to be on the up and up.  Truly certain that SQK - if not THE perfect model, is one hell of a lot closer than relativity.  Have You read Secrets?  (Or Subquantum Kinetics...?)

I have "Secrets...". First of all I was not suggesting that he was embellishing. However, he did have the Turman papers as an addendum and discussed them. That indicates to me that he was aware of Dr. Brown at some point to include into the book which further indicates that he had to have known for some amount of time.

Nothing other than that.

I am not slandering him in the least.

Mikado

[Linda Brown]

I have "Secrets...". First of all I was not suggesting that he was embellishing.  What WERE you suggesting then actually Mikado?

I am not slandering him in the least.

Wise move.

we all know that slander is not your style Mikado. .
Because you know that you can not get away with it. So you knock it down a few notches and go with the " negative innuendos...." which I have to admit you have honed to a fine art. Your messages are riddled with them and they are meant to create discord.

And it works... until it doesn't.

Right now its just wasting time.

Linda

[Mikado]

I have "Secrets...". First of all I was not suggesting that he was embellishing.  What WERE you suggesting then actually Mikado?

I am not slandering him in the least.

Wise move.

we all know that slander is not your style Mikado. .
Because you know that you can not get away with it. So you knock it down a few notches and go with the " negative innuendos...." which I have to admit you have honed to a fine art. Your messages are riddled with them and they are meant to create discord.

And it works... until it doesn't.

Right now its just wasting time.

Linda

Just look at what you posted and then ask yourself the same questions you asked me.

Oh, and I quoted you so that your message will stay. I know how you enjoy the delete/edit key.

Mikado

[Linda Brown]

And just what is it to you that I use a facility here that is provided to me? Again the negative innuendo Mikado.

Why don't you join MPC. He might need some help in that area. I think some are catching on to him.

Notice that was a suggestion. Not a directive.   Linda

[Mikado]

And just what is it to you that I use a facility here that is provided to me? Again the negative innuendo Mikado.

Why don't you join MPC. He might need some help in that area. I think some are catching on to him.

Notice that was a suggestion. Not a directive.   Linda

More Brownisms

(in the voice of W.C. Fields)

" Go away kid, you are bothering everybody...go play on the white line on the street"

Mikado

[Linda Brown]

Not going anywhere Mikado.