Unidentified Lunar Objects - Allen Sturm

[zorgon]

Well researching Orbs puts you in the 'nuts' department so ya have 2/3

Better get with the program we need perfection here 3/3 or out the door

[deuem]

Well researching Orbs puts you in the 'nuts' department so ya have 2/3

Better get with the program we need perfection here 3/3 or out the door

Maybe this will earn me the last third.

Here is a picure of an Orb being photographed by a second person. I have both photos. The person taking this photo was more than 6 feet away. This is a very tight crop. Maybe it is a firefly but they said they have none. Are we left with Orbs or water droplets? I so do want to get that final 1/3. I don't like doors.



This picture may or may not make one think.

C&N Deuem working on S

[exuberant1]

I said moisture related orbs.

[deuem]

I said moisture related orbs.

I agree, the moisture Orbs or as I call them the invasion fleets ( for fun ) are prety easy to spot and weed out. It is the very defined single Orbs that are not. It is a hobby of mine to collect these and process them to see what I can fiind out. I process everything I can that has to do with light. We do have a few Orb threads here in Lindas section. It gets to be like chasing UFOs. Its that last few percent that can't be explained away. Like the ones that are 50 feet away and up under something. Others photographed with more than one camera at the same time to get a fix on location. It's fun if you like it.

Deuem

[exuberant1]

Look at it this way, if you were a UFO that wished to remain so, you'd do your scooting around in the rain whenever possible.

Seen in that light, hunting for anomalies in such photos is not such a bad idea - so long as you can separate the signal from the noise, so to speak.

[deuem]

Look at it this way, if you were a UFO that wished to remain so, you'd do your scooting around in the rain whenever possible.

Seen in that light, hunting for anomalies in such photos is not such a bad idea - so long as you can separate the signal from the noise, so to speak.

Seeing between the noise and the signal is the hard part. It seems like every crackpot that has a computer wants to be the next Spielberg. They even have UFO schools here. That is CGI UFO schools. I do like that shot of a shot I posted. It made me stop and think. Having both shots made it even harder. To my knowledge water vapor at over 6 feet is not going to show up as a 2 inch ball on two cameras. So this end of the crazy stuff makes life interesting enough to hobby it.

I am also sure I have been faked out. Some are so good it is hard to tell. CGI has come a long way and now it seems we have to team up to figure it out. When the team is stumped, it gets interesting again.

Deuem

[exuberant1]

CGI has ruined UFO videos for me.

I don't investigate them anymore unless I'm doing it IRL. The internet still has some good cases, but they really do get swamped over and buried by the other ones.

*Orwell feared that the truth would be concealed from us. Huxley feared the truth would be drowned in a sea of irrelevance.

[LSWONE]

Love the book! Thanks for sharing.
Now I need to rejoin all the slides back to one PDF so I can print it out at work!

[Vandalis]

Yay im glad somone still has a copy. Thx for gettign it out there. I was poor when i got my copy. Lucky for me you could donate as much as u wanted to. Think i got mine for $2 lol.

Think ill make some copys so i dont loose it again. Then im goona give it another look over.

Some really nice finds in that book.

[zorgon]

Most IMPORTANT thing in that book

The NASA IMAGE NUMBERS

Someone have time to make a list of them? Then I can get the original photos

[zorgon]

*Orwell feared that the truth would be concealed from us. Huxley feared the truth would be drowned in a sea of irrelevance.

What IF the only truth is UFO's are an elaborate CIA Psyops Program?

I have documents for that

[zorgon]

This picture may or may not make one think.

Never mind the orb... whazdat creepy alien on the right   

[LSWONE]

Most IMPORTANT thing in that book

The NASA IMAGE NUMBERS

Someone have time to make a list of them? Then I can get the original photos

I'm busy in Palmdale right now but should have sometime on Monday.

[watchZEITGEISTnow]

AS08-12-2209
AS08-13-2244
AS08-13-2246
AS08-13-2267
AS10-28-4012
AS11-41-6139
AS12-52-7757
AS15-88-12002
AS15-M-2502
AS17-150-22942
AS17-150-22948
AS17-151-23260
AS17-151-23261
AS17-162-24106

[zorgon]

AS17-162-24106


Credit NASA Interesting blue on this copy - Click for full size