News:

Forum is currently set to Admin Approval for New Members
Pegasus Gofundme website



Main Menu

Aether Displacement

Started by mpc755, June 23, 2012, 08:10:22 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Pimander

#405
Quote from: mpc755 on July 10, 2012, 02:18:14 PM
I have figured out what unites relativity with quantum physics. If you, and other posters, choose not to understand this then that is your choice.
OK, I'm sick of your nonsense now!  You are only interested in your own ideas so I'll help you out shall I?

If YOU PERSONALLY, "have figured out what unites relativity with quantum physics," then you are in line for a Nobel Prize.

Congratulations for unifying physics, you will be bigger than Einstein, Newton and the rest.  Oh yes, don't forget to publish a paper on it, otherwise someone might pinch your idea off here and submit that Nobel Prize winning paper first.  DOH! ::)

Some people just don't get it!

Linda Brown

He keeps asking you all why you don't understand him and I am sitting back here because all of the scientific rhetoric is way over my head but I do see a trend and a motion that somehow you smart folks have missed.

He is leading you off. The entire pack. And you don't see it. What a glorious waste of the intellect expressed here.

Trickfox..... you are following a drag bag... there is no fox at the end of this discussion. Just more discussion.

Linda

mpc755

Quote from: Linda Brown on July 10, 2012, 03:02:17 PM
He keeps asking you all why you don't understand him and I am sitting back here because all of the scientific rhetoric is way over my head but I do see a trend and a motion that somehow you smart folks have missed.

He is leading you off. The entire pack. And you don't see it. What a glorious waste of the intellect expressed here.

Trickfox..... you are following a drag bag... there is no fox at the end of this discussion. Just more discussion.

Linda

All you have to do is understand how water is displaced by objects which exist in it and how the bow wave of a boat is a water displacement wave and you can understand aether displacement.

Why do you choose not to understand aether displacement correctly explains what occurs physically in nature to cause gravity and the observed behaviors in a double slit experiment?

Linda Brown

Talk to Mikado.   Linda

mpc755

Quote from: Linda Brown on July 10, 2012, 03:34:50 PM
Talk to Mikado.   Linda

I'm asking you. I have correctly explained what occurs physically in nature to cause gravity. I have correctly explained what occurs physically in nature to cause the observed behaviors in a double slit experiment.

Displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward matter is gravity.

In a double slit experiment, the particle has a well defined trajectory which takes it through one slit while the associated aether wave passes through both.

You insist on not understanding this. Why?

Linda Brown

You asked me why. Here is the answer.

I think that you are a puppet of Mikados. Sent here to spend an amazing amount of time beating around a nonexistant bush.... wasting everyones valuable time.

You constantly repeat the same phrases which speaks to me that you are a programed individual. As such I have not time for you or your thoughts or your questions because they are not in my opinion in the slightest genuine.

You asked. There is the answer. Linda

mpc755

Quote from: Linda Brown on July 10, 2012, 03:43:14 PM
You asked me why. Here is the answer.

I think that you are a puppet of Mikados. Sent here to spend an amazing amount of time beating around a nonexistant bush.... wasting everyones valuable time.

You constantly repeat the same phrases which speaks to me that you are a programed individual. As such I have not time for you or your thoughts or your questions because they are not in my opinion in the slightest genuine.

You asked. There is the answer. Linda

I am not a sockpuppet of anyone. I figured out aether displacement on my own 30 years ago.

Why does everyone seem to be afraid of understanding what occurs physically in nature to cause gravity and the observed behaviors in a double slit experiment?

I shouldn't have to repeat my self. The evidence is obvious and clear. The following IS evidence of aether displacement.


'NASA's Voyager Hits New Region at Solar System Edge'
http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2011/dec/HQ_11-402_AGU_Voyager.html

"Voyager is showing that what is outside is pushing back. ... Like cars piling up at a clogged freeway off-ramp, the increased intensity of the magnetic field shows that inward pressure from interstellar space is compacting it."

It is the aether which is displaced by the matter the solar system consists of which is pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward the solar system.

'Offset between dark matter and ordinary matter: evidence from a sample of 38 lensing clusters of galaxies'
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/1004/1004.1475v1.pdf

"Our data strongly support the idea that the gravitational potential in clusters is mainly due to a non-baryonic fluid, and any exotic field in gravitational theory must resemble that of CDM fields very closely."

The offset is due to the galaxy clusters moving through the aether. The analogy is a submarine moving through the water. You are under water. Two miles away from you are many lights. Moving between you and the lights one mile away is a submarine. The submarine displaces the water. The state of displacement of the water causes the center of the lensing of the light propagating through the water to be offset from the center of the submarine itself. The offset between the center of the lensing of the light propagating through the water displaced by the submarine and the center of the submarine itself is going to remain the same as the submarine moves through the water. The submarine continually displaces different regions of the water. The state of the water connected to and neighboring the submarine remains the same as the submarine moves through the water even though it is not the same water the submarine continually displaces. This is what is occurring physically in nature as the galaxy clusters move through the aether.

'Surprise! IBEX Finds No Bow 'Shock' Outside our Solar System'
http://www.universetoday.com/95094/surprise-ibex-finds-no-bow-shock-outside-our-solar-system/

'"While bow shocks certainly exist ahead of many other stars, we're finding that our Sun's interaction doesn't reach the critical threshold to form a shock," said Dr. David McComas, principal investigator of the IBEX mission, "so a wave is a more accurate depiction of what's happening ahead of our heliosphere — much like the wave made by the bow of a boat as it glides through the water."'

The wave ahead of our heliosphere is an aether displacement wave. This is evidence of a moving 'particle', the solar system, having an associated aether wave.

'Hubble Finds Ghostly Ring of Dark Matter'
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/hubble/news/dark_matter_ring_feature.html

"Astronomers using NASA's Hubble Space Telescope got a first-hand view of how dark matter behaves during a titanic collision between two galaxy clusters. The wreck created a ripple of dark mater, which is somewhat similar to a ripple formed in a pond when a rock hits the water."

The 'pond' consists of aether. The moving 'particles' are the galaxy clusters. The ripple is an aether displacement wave. The ripple is a gravitational wave. This is also evidence of a moving 'particle', the galaxy clusters, having an associated aether wave.

'Dark Matter Core Defies Explanation in NASA Hubble Image '
http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2012/mar/HQ_12-068_Hubble_Dark_Core.html

"This technique revealed the dark matter in Abell 520 had collected into a "dark core," containing far fewer galaxies than would be expected if the dark matter and galaxies were anchored together. Most of the galaxies apparently have sailed far away from the collision. "This result is a puzzle," said astronomer James Jee of the University of California in Davis, lead author of paper about the results available online in The Astrophysical Journal. "Dark matter is not behaving as predicted, and it's not obviously clear what is going on. It is difficult to explain this Hubble observation with the current theories of galaxy formation and dark matter.""

The dark matter core does not defy explanation. The dark matter core is not a puzzle. The dark matter core is not difficult to explain. It is obviously clear what is going on.

Dark matter and galaxies are not anchored together. Matter moves through and displaces the aether.

'Giant black hole kicked out of home galaxy'
http://www.astronomy.com/en/News-Observing/News/2012/06/Giant%20black%20hole%20kicked%20out%20of%20home%20galaxy.aspx

"But these new data support the idea that gravitational waves — ripples in the fabric of space first predicted by Albert Einstein but never detected directly — can exert an extremely powerful force."

The fabric of space is the aether.

Gravitational waves are ripples in the aether.

What ripples when galaxy clusters collide is what waves in a double slit experiment; the aether.

Einstein's gravitational wave is de Broglie's pilot-wave.

They are both aether displacement waves.

Linda Brown

Tell Mikado I don't believe a word you or he says.

You can repeat things all you want. It is a waste of your time and energy unless you can break the bonds that hold you and actually interact with the people here who have tried to reach out to you.


Good luck to you.   Linda

mpc755

#413
Quote from: Linda Brown on July 10, 2012, 04:08:35 PM
Tell Mikado I don't believe a word you or he says.

You can repeat things all you want. It is a waste of your time and energy unless you can break the bonds that hold you and actually interact with the people here who have tried to reach out to you.


Good luck to you.   Linda

No one except for Mikado has reached out. All everyone else has done is put up road blocks to their being able to understand aether displacement, yourself included.

You can't even answer if 'stuff' has mass. Why?

You insisted I explain the energy in a vacuum in an experiment I had never even heard of before in terms of aether displacement or you were going to walk away from the conversation. Why?

What is it with the posters on this forum who's only idea of 'helping' the thread is to pontificate their own ideas which have nothing to do whatsoever with aether displacement?

What is it with the posters on this forum who insist on not understanding the following IS evidence of aether displacement?

'NASA's Voyager Hits New Region at Solar System Edge'
http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2011/dec/HQ_11-402_AGU_Voyager.html

"Voyager is showing that what is outside is pushing back. ... Like cars piling up at a clogged freeway off-ramp, the increased intensity of the magnetic field shows that inward pressure from interstellar space is compacting it."

It is the aether which is displaced by the matter the solar system consists of which is pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward the solar system.

'Offset between dark matter and ordinary matter: evidence from a sample of 38 lensing clusters of galaxies'
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/1004/1004.1475v1.pdf

"Our data strongly support the idea that the gravitational potential in clusters is mainly due to a non-baryonic fluid, and any exotic field in gravitational theory must resemble that of CDM fields very closely."

The offset is due to the galaxy clusters moving through the aether. The analogy is a submarine moving through the water. You are under water. Two miles away from you are many lights. Moving between you and the lights one mile away is a submarine. The submarine displaces the water. The state of displacement of the water causes the center of the lensing of the light propagating through the water to be offset from the center of the submarine itself. The offset between the center of the lensing of the light propagating through the water displaced by the submarine and the center of the submarine itself is going to remain the same as the submarine moves through the water. The submarine continually displaces different regions of the water. The state of the water connected to and neighboring the submarine remains the same as the submarine moves through the water even though it is not the same water the submarine continually displaces. This is what is occurring physically in nature as the galaxy clusters move through the aether.

'Surprise! IBEX Finds No Bow 'Shock' Outside our Solar System'
http://www.universetoday.com/95094/surprise-ibex-finds-no-bow-shock-outside-our-solar-system/

'"While bow shocks certainly exist ahead of many other stars, we're finding that our Sun's interaction doesn't reach the critical threshold to form a shock," said Dr. David McComas, principal investigator of the IBEX mission, "so a wave is a more accurate depiction of what's happening ahead of our heliosphere — much like the wave made by the bow of a boat as it glides through the water."'

The wave ahead of our heliosphere is an aether displacement wave. This is evidence of a moving 'particle', the solar system, having an associated aether wave.

'Hubble Finds Ghostly Ring of Dark Matter'
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/hubble/news/dark_matter_ring_feature.html

"Astronomers using NASA's Hubble Space Telescope got a first-hand view of how dark matter behaves during a titanic collision between two galaxy clusters. The wreck created a ripple of dark mater, which is somewhat similar to a ripple formed in a pond when a rock hits the water."

The 'pond' consists of aether. The moving 'particles' are the galaxy clusters. The ripple is an aether displacement wave. The ripple is a gravitational wave. This is also evidence of a moving 'particle', the galaxy clusters, having an associated aether wave.

'Dark Matter Core Defies Explanation in NASA Hubble Image '
http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2012/mar/HQ_12-068_Hubble_Dark_Core.html

"This technique revealed the dark matter in Abell 520 had collected into a "dark core," containing far fewer galaxies than would be expected if the dark matter and galaxies were anchored together. Most of the galaxies apparently have sailed far away from the collision. "This result is a puzzle," said astronomer James Jee of the University of California in Davis, lead author of paper about the results available online in The Astrophysical Journal. "Dark matter is not behaving as predicted, and it's not obviously clear what is going on. It is difficult to explain this Hubble observation with the current theories of galaxy formation and dark matter.""

The dark matter core does not defy explanation. The dark matter core is not a puzzle. The dark matter core is not difficult to explain. It is obviously clear what is going on.

Dark matter and galaxies are not anchored together. Matter moves through and displaces the aether.

'Giant black hole kicked out of home galaxy'
http://www.astronomy.com/en/News-Observing/News/2012/06/Giant%20black%20hole%20kicked%20out%20of%20home%20galaxy.aspx

"But these new data support the idea that gravitational waves — ripples in the fabric of space first predicted by Albert Einstein but never detected directly — can exert an extremely powerful force."

The fabric of space is the aether.

Gravitational waves are ripples in the aether.

What ripples when galaxy clusters collide is what waves in a double slit experiment; the aether.

Einstein's gravitational wave is de Broglie's pilot-wave.

They are both aether displacement waves.

Linda Brown

The answer to it all is found in his response here

No one except for Mikado has reached out.Thats the entire ball of wax folks... none of your words meant a thing Pimander... nor yours Hobbit...He can't see any of that. He just is as a machine... repeating over and over and over.....

Much the way you respond Mikado.

Linda


mpc755

Quote from: Linda Brown on July 10, 2012, 04:48:04 PM
The answer to it all is found in his response here

No one except for Mikado has reached out.Thats the entire ball of wax folks... none of your words meant a thing Pimander... nor yours Hobbit...He can't see any of that. He just is as a machine... repeating over and over and over.....

Much the way you respond Mikado.

Linda

Point to one post where any poster, besides Mikado, actually discusses aether displacement and does not just pontificate their own idea.

It is all as simple as your inability to answer the following question.

Does 'stuff' have mass?

In aether displacement, aether has mass and is physically displaced by matter.

Pimander

Quote from: mpc755 on July 10, 2012, 05:02:05 PM
Point to one post where any poster, besides Mikado, actually discusses aether displacement and does not just pontificate their own idea.
mpc755=pontificate
forum=discussion (which would normally involve more than one persons ideas)

You don't get it....

Linda Brown

Oh but Primander. He knows EXACTLY what his agenda is.... he may not understand WHY he is doing what he is doing.... but he is very sure that this is his mission here. And it has NOTHING to do with aether displacement as much as distraction from other subjects. The time you spend here trying to " reach him" is time pulled away from other more productive endeavors here.

So if you see that there is a possibility of that happening here and you don't totally disagree with me... then I would suggest turning to another thread and leaving this one to him.   Linda

mpc755

Quote from: Pimander on July 10, 2012, 05:32:28 PM
mpc755=pontificate
forum=discussion (which would normally involve more than one persons ideas)

You don't get it....

This thread is titled 'Aether Displacement'. This thread is to discuss aether displacement. In aether displacement, aether has mass and physically occupies three dimensional space. Aether is physically displaced by matter. Displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward matter is gravity. In a double slit experiment, a moving particle has an associated aether displacement wave. The particle travels a well defined trajectory which takes it through one slit while the associated aether wave passes through both.

I look forward to your first post where you actually discuss aether displacement.

Linda Brown

Do you even get how boring this is?  Bye.   Linda