Aether Displacement

[Linda Brown]

I have united relativity with quantum physics.

My Goodness!  Write your paper! Present this to the world! Why are you still here? In fact thats a VERY good question. WHY are you here?

   Linda

[zorgon]

Why are you still here? In fact thats a VERY good question. WHY are you here?

To present his vision to the world
Just like many others are here

And he only has one thread

[mpc755]

I have united relativity with quantum physics.

My Goodness!  Write your paper! Present this to the world! Why are you still here? In fact thats a VERY good question. WHY are you here?

   Linda

For the most part, mainstream physics is in denial of the existence of the aether.

I need those of us who understand there is an aether to begin discussing the aether using a common language.

I need those of us who understand there is an aether to understand and speak up about there not being any substance referred to as non-baryonic dark matter anchored to matter.

I need those of us who understand there is an aether to understand and speak up about what is presently postulated as non-baryonic dark matter anchored to matter is actually the aether which matter moves through and displaces.

I need those of us who understand there is an aether to understand and speak up about aether has mass, physically occupies three dimensional space and is physically displaced by matter.

I need those of us who understand there is an aether to understand and speak up about displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward matter being gravity.

I need those of us who understand there is an aether to understand and speak up about the wave of wave-particle duality being an aether wave.

I need those of us who understand there is an aether to understand and speak up about aether displacement being the most correct explanation of what occurs physically in nature.

[Linda Brown]

Thats the first progress I have seen here.

And Zorgon.... yes.... I agree with you that having the ability to be here and speak up is important!

However  it should be at least noted that this conversation has gone in circles so many times I think (as well as others) that this has been primarily just a sort of intellectual sinkhole... intentionally placed here.

Could that be possible?

But maybe there is hope for it after all?

Nice turn MPC. Now lets see if anyone actually answers you.  Linda

[mpc755]

no comment...well ...boring.
hobbit

'Dark Matter Core Defies Explanation in NASA Hubble Image '
http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2012/mar/HQ_12-068_Hubble_Dark_Core.html

"This technique revealed the dark matter in Abell 520 had collected into a "dark core," containing far fewer galaxies than would be expected if the dark matter and galaxies were anchored together. Most of the galaxies apparently have sailed far away from the collision. "This result is a puzzle," said astronomer James Jee of the University of California in Davis, lead author of paper about the results available online in The Astrophysical Journal. "Dark matter is not behaving as predicted, and it's not obviously clear what is going on. It is difficult to explain this Hubble observation with the current theories of galaxy formation and dark matter.""

The dark matter core does not defy explanation. The dark matter core is not a puzzle. The dark matter core is not difficult to explain. It is obviously clear what is going on.

Dark matter and galaxies are not anchored together. There is no such thing as non-baryonic dark matter traveling with matter.

Aether has mass. Matter moves through and displaces the aether.

I look forward to your more correct explanation.

[hobbit]

'Dark Matter Core Defies Explanation in NASA Hubble Image '
http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2012/mar/HQ_12-068_Hubble_Dark_Core.html

"This technique revealed the dark matter in Abell 520 had collected into a "dark core," containing far fewer galaxies than would be expected if the dark matter and galaxies were anchored together. Most of the galaxies apparently have sailed far away from the collision. "This result is a puzzle," said astronomer James Jee of the University of California in Davis, lead author of paper about the results available online in The Astrophysical Journal. "Dark matter is not behaving as predicted, and it's not obviously clear what is going on. It is difficult to explain this Hubble observation with the current theories of galaxy formation and dark matter.""

The dark matter core does not defy explanation. The dark matter core is not a puzzle. The dark matter core is not difficult to explain. It is obviously clear what is going on.

Dark matter and galaxies are not anchored together. There is no such thing as non-baryonic dark matter traveling with matter.

Aether has mass. Matter moves through and displaces the aether.

I look forward to your more correct explanation.

The quote was nothing to do with You mpc.

I welcome at last You requesting others theories on the aether...
"I look forward to your more correct explanation"

I do not doubt at all that there is a net inrush into this planet, whereas there could be a net outrush from the sun?

It is the methodology of how this occurs where I for one would offer additional theory relative to what You have pounded at us so much( which fits Your theory funnily enough??)
There are plenty here who as they origonally said at the beginning of this thread see great merit in where You are going, but You are alienating them by repeating parrot fashion the self same sentences.
We are Your friends.
hobbit

[mpc755]

The quote was nothing to do with You mpc.

I welcome at last You requesting others theories on the aether...
"I look forward to your more correct explanation"

I do not doubt at all that there is a net inrush into this planet, whereas there could be a net outrush from the sun?

It is the methodology of how this occurs where I for one would offer additional theory relative to what You have pounded at us so much( which fits Your theory funnily enough??)
There are plenty here who as they origonally said at the beginning of this thread see great merit in where You are going, but You are alienating them by repeating parrot fashion the self same sentences.
We are Your friends.
hobbit

There is no net outrush from the Sun.

What you are referring to as the inrush to this planet is the force associated with the aether displaced by the Earth which is pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward the Earth.

Until you understand aether displacement is correct and correctly explains what occurs physically in nature to cause gravity and the observed behaviors in a double slit experiment you are not helping.

You are more interested in your own notions than in understanding what this thread is about.

I am explaining to you why there is a dark matter core.

'Dark Matter Core Defies Explanation in NASA Hubble Image '
http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2012/mar/HQ_12-068_Hubble_Dark_Core.html

"This technique revealed the dark matter in Abell 520 had collected into a "dark core," containing far fewer galaxies than would be expected if the dark matter and galaxies were anchored together. Most of the galaxies apparently have sailed far away from the collision. "This result is a puzzle," said astronomer James Jee of the University of California in Davis, lead author of paper about the results available online in The Astrophysical Journal. "Dark matter is not behaving as predicted, and it's not obviously clear what is going on. It is difficult to explain this Hubble observation with the current theories of galaxy formation and dark matter.""

The dark matter core does not defy explanation. The dark matter core is not a puzzle. The dark matter core is not difficult to explain. It is obviously clear what is going on.

Dark matter and galaxies are not anchored together. There is no such thing as non-baryonic dark matter traveling with matter.

Aether has mass. Matter moves through and displaces the aether.

The analogy are two boats which pass by each other closely. Their bow waves interact and slosh back and forth.

'Slosh' may not be an entirely accurate analogy since the aether is, or behaves similar to, a superfluid with properties of a solid; an incompressible fluid. However, the analogy is correct in describing the boats as moving through and displacing the water.

You need to understand I correctly understand why there is a dark matter core.

[mpc755]

Moderators: Can this thread be moved out of Linda's area or can I start a thread titled 'Aether Displacement' in another area and have this thread locked or deleted?

Linda: I hope you will continue to participate in this thread. However, now that I realize it is under your area I do not think this is the correct place for it.

[The Executioner]

Moderators: Can this thread be moved out of Linda's area or can I start a thread titled 'Aether Displacement' in another area and have this thread locked or deleted?

Linda: I hope you will continue to participate in this thread. However, now that I realize it is under your area I do not think this is the correct place for it.

The thread will be moved.

All members:  Please refrain from discussing each other and stick to the topic of the thread.

http://www.thelivingmoon.com/forum/index.php?topic=1853.0

[Linda Brown]

I absolutely agree.

( I wrote before this little note... messages crossing in the aether!)

"All members:  Please refrain from discussing each other and stick to the topic of the thread. We were, properly tending to business here....I thought.... weren't we? I note that my earlier thread was removed. I had simply restated his first statement on this thread so that we could talk about THAT. I believe that was proper. And you say that was a PERSONAL conversation? I post a complaint on that.

But MPC has asked for the thread to be moved which I guess solves the entire problem.

   Linda

[mpc755]

If anyone is finding this thread for the first time and wonders what aether displacement is all about I suggest you read the first post and the following.

'Dark Matter Core Defies Explanation in NASA Hubble Image '
http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2012/mar/HQ_12-068_Hubble_Dark_Core.html

"This technique revealed the dark matter in Abell 520 had collected into a "dark core," containing far fewer galaxies than would be expected if the dark matter and galaxies were anchored together. Most of the galaxies apparently have sailed far away from the collision. "This result is a puzzle," said astronomer James Jee of the University of California in Davis, lead author of paper about the results available online in The Astrophysical Journal. "Dark matter is not behaving as predicted, and it's not obviously clear what is going on. It is difficult to explain this Hubble observation with the current theories of galaxy formation and dark matter.""

The dark matter core does not defy explanation. The dark matter core is not a puzzle. The dark matter core is not difficult to explain. It is obviously clear what is going on.

Dark matter and galaxies are not anchored together. There is no such thing as non-baryonic dark matter traveling with matter.

Aether has mass. Matter moves through and displaces the aether.

The analogy are two boats which pass by each other closely. Their bow waves interact and the water sloshes back and forth.

'Sloshes' may not be an entirely accurate analogy since the aether is, or behaves similar to, a superfluid with properties of a solid; a supersolid. However, the analogy is correct in describing the boats as moving through and displacing the water. The galaxies are moving through and displacing the aether.

[mpc755]

'Dark matter scaffolding of universe detected for the first time'
http://www.astronomy.com/en/News-Observing/News/2012/07/Dark%20matter%20scaffolding%20of%20universe%20detected%20for%20the%20first%20time.aspx

"It looks like there's a bridge that shows that there is additional mass beyond what the clusters contain," he said. "The clusters alone cannot explain this additional mass."

What exists between the galaxy clusters is aether. Aether has mass.

The galaxy clusters are not traveling with non-baryonic dark matter. The galaxy clusters are moving through and displacing the aether.

[COSMO]

Hi all!  Marvelous mind candy being shared here!!!  I do accept the existence of an aether/ether, but was wondering...
If a particle is a standing wave, isn't saying that matter displaces aether is like saying a wave displaces the ocean?
I think it is something like this...
Particle is to aether as wave is to ocean.  Not separate, always connected, all is one.
If matter displaces aether, then how do you account for inertia and gravity which affects every particle/atom of matter of an object to it's core.  I think we need to keep in mind that after an object accelerates to a steady speed, then the G(gravity) force subsides to zero.  Seat of the pants stuff!  lol  If there was constant resistance from a displaced aether, then the G force would not subside, but increase as speed increases.  All matter is never apart from its source, the aether.  Inertia is stored in the aether(space).   IMHO that connection is the source of mass, inertia and gravity and more.  Or I could just have toooo much free time on my hands!!!! lol 
COSMO
By the way...that's my dog's name!  : )

[Littleenki]

Halloloooya!
Gold for you Cosmo!
Well put new member!
Cheers!
Littleenki

[mpc755]

Hi all!  Marvelous mind candy being shared here!!!  I do accept the existence of an aether/ether, but was wondering...
If a particle is a standing wave, isn't saying that matter displaces aether is like saying a wave displaces the ocean?

The moving particle has an associated aether wave.

I think it is something like this...
Particle is to aether as wave is to ocean.  Not separate, always connected, all is one.
If matter displaces aether, then how do you account for inertia and gravity which affects every particle/atom of matter of an object to it's core.  I think we need to keep in mind that after an object accelerates to a steady speed, then the G(gravity) force subsides to zero.  Seat of the pants stuff!  lol  If there was constant resistance from a displaced aether, then the G force would not subside, but increase as speed increases.  All matter is never apart from its source, the aether.  Inertia is stored in the aether(space).   IMHO that connection is the source of mass, inertia and gravity and more.  Or I could just have toooo much free time on my hands!!!! lol 
COSMO
By the way...that's my dog's name!  : )

The better analogy is a boat made of ice moving through the water. The boat is made of condensations of liquid water. The boat is connected to the water. However, the boat moves through and displaces the water. The water is not anchored to the boat. The boat has a bow wave. The bow wave is the boat's water displacement wave.

A particle of matter moves through the aether. A particle of matter is made of condensations of aether. The particle of matter is connected to the aether. The particle moves through and displaces the aether. The particle of matter is not anchored to the aether. The moving particle has an associated aether displacement wave.