Aether Displacement

[mpc755]

Mpc755, i no'm about to've contradicted your statement, but only did add the technique to deal with such a mystic entity like ether is 

We are both discussing the state of displacement of the aether.

The reason why aether is displaced by matter is because it has mass and physically occupies three dimensional space.

Aether displacement describes the role aether plays in general relativity.

Aether displacement describes the role aether plays in quantum physics.

Aether displacement unifies relativity and quantum mechanics.

Einstein's gravitational wave is de Broglie's pilot-wave.

They are both aether displacement waves.

[SarK0Y]

We are both discussing the state of displacement of the aether.

The reason why aether is displaced by matter is because it has mass and physically occupies three dimensional space.

Aether displacement describes the role aether plays in general relativity.

Aether displacement describes the role aether plays in quantum physics.

Aether displacement unifies relativity and quantum mechanics.

Einstein's gravitational wave is de Broglie's pilot-wave.

They are both aether displacement waves.

i'm not sure ether has mass because gravity ain't only force.

[mpc755]

i'm not sure ether has mass because gravity ain't only force.

The notion of non-baryonic dark matter traveling with matter is incorrect. There is not such thing as non-baryonic dark matter anchored to matter.

What is presently postulated as non-baryonic dark matter which travels with matter is actually the aether which matter moves through and displaces.

'Dark matter' has now been detected between galaxy clusters.

'Dark matter scaffolding of universe detected for the first time'
http://www.astronomy.com/en/News-Observing/News/2012/07/Dark%20matter%20scaffolding%20of%20universe%20detected%20for%20the%20first%20time.aspx

"It looks like there's a bridge that shows that there is additional mass beyond what the clusters contain," he said. "The clusters alone cannot explain this additional mass."

'Dark matter' has also been detected not anchored to galaxies which refutes the notion dark matter is anchored to matter.

'Dark Matter Core Defies Explanation in NASA Hubble Image'
http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2012/mar/HQ_12-068_Hubble_Dark_Core.html

"This technique revealed the dark matter in Abell 520 had collected into a "dark core," containing far fewer galaxies than would be expected if the dark matter and galaxies were anchored together. Most of the galaxies apparently have sailed far away from the collision. "This result is a puzzle," said astronomer James Jee of the University of California in Davis, lead author of paper about the results available online in The Astrophysical Journal. "Dark matter is not behaving as predicted, and it's not obviously clear what is going on. It is difficult to explain this Hubble observation with the current theories of galaxy formation and dark matter.""

The dark matter core does not defy explanation. The dark matter core is not a puzzle. The dark matter core is not difficult to explain. It is obviously clear what is going on.

Dark matter and galaxies are not anchored together. There is no such thing as non-baryonic dark matter traveling with matter.

The analogy are two boats which pass by each other closely. Their bow waves interact and the water sloshes back and forth.

'Sloshes' may not be an entirely accurate analogy since the aether is, or behaves similar to, a superfluid with properties of a solid; a supersolid. However, the analogy is correct in describing the boats as moving through and displacing the water. The galaxies are moving through and displacing the aether.

All of the evidence is evidence there is no such thing as non-baryonic dark matter anchored to matter. All of the evidence is evidence aether has mass and matter moves through and displaces the aether.

Aether having mass is what allows it to physically occupy three dimensional space, be physically displaced by matter and to push back and exert inward pressure toward matter; which is gravity.

Aether having mass is what allows it to be displaced into the form of a wave by a moving particle.

Aether having mass is what allows it to be the wave of wave-particle duality.

Robert B. Laughlin, Nobel Laureate in Physics, endowed chair in physics, Stanford University said the following.

"It is ironic that Einstein's most creative work, the general theory of relativity, should boil down to conceptualizing space as a medium when his original premise [in special relativity] was that no such medium existed [..] The word 'ether' has extremely negative connotations in theoretical physics because of its past association with opposition to relativity. This is unfortunate because, stripped of these connotations, it rather nicely captures the way most physicists actually think about the vacuum. . . . Relativity actually says nothing about the existence or nonexistence of matter pervading the universe, only that any such matter must have relativistic symmetry. [..] It turns out that such matter exists.

Matter has mass. Describing the aether as matter is ascribing mass to the aether.

"About the time relativity was becoming accepted, studies of radioactivity began showing that the empty vacuum of space had spectroscopic structure similar to that of ordinary quantum solids and fluids. Subsequent studies with large particle accelerators have now led us to understand that space is more like a piece of window glass than ideal Newtonian emptiness. It is filled with 'stuff' that is normally transparent but can be made visible by hitting it sufficiently hard to knock out a part.

'Stuff' has mass. Describing aether as 'stuff' is ascribing mass to the aether.

"The modern concept of the vacuum of space, confirmed every day by experiment, is a relativistic ether. But we do not call it this because it is taboo."

[mpc755]

'Empty Space is not Empty!'


"Why does nothing weigh something"

'Nothing' weighs something because aether has mass.

"Most of the mass of the proton comes not from the quarks within a proton but from the empty space between the quarks"

The empty space in a proton consists of aether.

Aether has mass.

[mpc755]

The rate at which an atomic clock ticks is determined by the state of the aether in which it exists. The faster a clock moves with respect to the state of the aether in which it exists the more aether the clock displaces. The more aether the clock displaces the more the aether pushes back and exerts inward pressure toward the clock. The greater the aether pushes back and exerts inward pressure toward the clock the slower the clock ticks.

The rate at which an atomic clock ticks is a physical process determined by the physical state of the aether in which it exists, which is the state of displacement of the aether.

[COSMO]

I do agree with some of your observations but could you please explain inertia.

[mpc755]

I do agree with some of your observations but could you please explain inertia.

The aether is, or behaves similar to, a superfluid with properties of a solid; a supersolid.

As an object moves through the aether the object displaces the ether. The object requires energy to displace the aether. The aether returns to the object the same amount of energy as the aether 'displaces back'. There is no loss of energy in the interaction of the object and the aether.

You are in a bowling alley. The lane is made of a supersolid strong enough to support the bowling ball. The bowling alley is filled with a superfluid. You roll the bowling ball toward the pins. The bowling ball displaces the superfluid as the bowling ball rolls along on top of the supersolid. The bowling ball requires energy to displace the superfluid. The superfluid returns to the bowling ball the same amount of energy as the superfluid 'displaces back'.

There is no loss of energy in the interaction of the bowling ball and the superfluid and the bowling ball rolls forever.

[COSMO]

Considering that analogy, wouldn't the resistance only act on the surface of the bowling ball if it is displacing ether?  Same with gravity, if the bowling is displacing ether, then gravity would only act of the surface of an object.

[mpc755]

Considering that analogy, wouldn't the resistance only act on the surface of the bowling ball if it is displacing ether?  Same with gravity, if the bowling is displacing ether, then gravity would only act of the surface of an object.

Aether exists where particles of matter do not. So if we are discussing the Earth which is traveling through the aether, aether exists where the particles of matter do not throughout the Earth. Where the particles of matter the Earth consists of exist, the aether is displaced. This causes the displaced aether which exists external to the Earth to push back and exert inward pressure toward, and throughout, the Earth.

[Littleenki]

If aether exists where particles are not, then how can aether have mass?
Mass is made up of particles.
Aether is mass, and aether is particles, one in the same.
Fruit in the cake, beans in the broth, but all one and nothing connected.
Glass casting is forming a mass from particles, they are one and yet are a liquid, but their atoms never touch. Is the glass separate from the aether around it...of course it is, yet it is part of the whole, a whole which contains everything everywhere and appears separate beause of aether density.

Aether density decides what appears to be mass and what doesnt.

The bowling ball is the same as the aether, just more dense. It doesnt move either.

Nothing moves, it relocates through memory field interaction in a holographic universe.

ALL is one, and one is ALL
Yet nothing touches.hmmmm, sounds like a quagmire of unexpalinable physics, eh?
And thats what GOD is...life and its unexplainable unobservable light.

Sorry, mpc, had to chime in, with respect of course for your views.

Careful Cosmo, its deep in here!:-)

Le

[mpc755]

If aether exists where particles are not, then how can aether have mass?
Mass is made up of particles.
Aether is mass, and aether is particles, one in the same.
Fruit in the cake, beans in the broth, but all one and nothing connected.
Glass casting is forming a mass from particles, they are one and yet are a liquid, but their atoms never touch. Is the glass separate from the aether around it...of course it is, yet it is part of the whole, a whole which contains everything everywhere and appears separate beause of aether density.

Aether density decides what appears to be mass and what doesnt.

The bowling ball is the same as the aether, just more dense. It doesnt move either.

Nothing moves, it relocates through memory field interaction in a holographic universe.

ALL is one, and one is ALL
Yet nothing touches.hmmmm, sounds like a quagmire of unexpalinable physics, eh?
And thats what GOD is...life and its unexplainable unobservable light.

Sorry, mpc, had to chime in, with respect of course for your views.

Careful Cosmo, its deep in here!:-)

Le

Aether and matter are different states of the same material.

Aether and matter have mass.

Matter is condensations of aether.

[COSMO]

If aether exists where particles are not, then how can aether have mass?
Mass is made up of particles.
Aether is mass, and aether is particles, one in the same.
Fruit in the cake, beans in the broth, but all one and nothing connected.
Glass casting is forming a mass from particles, they are one and yet are a liquid, but their atoms never touch. Is the glass separate from the aether around it...of course it is, yet it is part of the whole, a whole which contains everything everywhere and appears separate beause of aether density.

Aether density decides what appears to be mass and what doesnt.

The bowling ball is the same as the aether, just more dense. It doesnt move either.

Nothing moves, it relocates through memory field interaction in a holographic universe.

ALL is one, and one is ALL
Yet nothing touches.hmmmm, sounds like a quagmire of unexpalinable physics, eh?
And thats what GOD is...life and its unexplainable unobservable light.

Sorry, mpc, had to chime in, with respect of course for your views.

Careful Cosmo, its deep in here!:-)

Le

Yes Le, but some of go where the rest fear to tread!  I'm up to my eyeballs in ether!!!!  Yes, a quagmire, an enigma wrapped in a conundrum, but I DO see the clear and simple model.

Matter, which has mass is nothing more than ether in movement.   

Not condensed.  When ether is placid it is NOT observable except by it's gravitation influence, and it acts on EVERY particle/wave of matter/energy.

I guess it can be talked about in terms of memory fields, but I kind of see that as a way that standard physics explains it without really explaining it.  What exactly is memory made out of anyway?  The perfect analogy is waves on the surface of the ocean.....yep here he goes with the wave thing again!  But consider the storm 1000 miles to sea that drives in the monstrous waves on the north shore of Hawaii.(lived there 3 years brah!!!)  It is not the water from the storm that reaches the beach but merely the ENERGY of the motion being transferred and creating the waves until they hit the shore.  That is what memory is, energy transferred in a 2 dimensional medium, that creates WAVES/PARTICLES.  We can't observe this transfer because we are 3 dimensional beings, it looks like MAGIC!!!  Hey....let's call it information!!!  Oh, that's already been done!     

[mpc755]

Yes Le, but some of go where the rest fear to tread!  I'm up to my eyeballs in ether!!!!  Yes, a quagmire, an enigma wrapped in a conundrum, but I DO see the clear and simple model.

Matter, which has mass is nothing more than ether in movement.   

Not condensed.  When ether is placid it is NOT observable except by it's gravitation influence, and it acts on EVERY particle/wave of matter/energy.

I guess it can be talked about in terms of memory fields, but I kind of see that as a way that standard physics explains it without really explaining it.  What exactly is memory made out of anyway?  The perfect analogy is waves on the surface of the ocean.....yep here he goes with the wave thing again!  But consider the storm 1000 miles to sea that drives in the monstrous waves on the north shore of Hawaii.(lived there 3 years brah!!!)  It is not the water from the storm that reaches the beach but merely the ENERGY of the motion being transferred and creating the waves until they hit the shore.  That is what memory is, energy transferred in a 2 dimensional medium, that creates WAVES/PARTICLES.  We can't observe this transfer because we are 3 dimensional beings, it looks like MAGIC!!!  Hey....let's call it information!!!  Oh, that's already been done!   

Non-baryonic dark matter has been found not to be anchored to matter.

Q. What is the difference between non-baryonic dark matter which is not anchored to matter and aether?
A. Nothing.

Aether has mass. Aether physically occupies three dimensional space. Aether is not anchored to matter. Matter moves through and displaces the aether.

Displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward matter is gravity.

A moving particle has an associated aether displacement wave. In a double slit experiment the moving particle travels through a single slit while the associated aether wave passes through both.

[mpc755]

'What fills space? - Craig Hogan, director of the Center for Particle Astrophysics'
http://www.fnal.gov/pub/today/

"For example, the Higgs field is much weirder than the comparisons with molasses or crowds suggest, since it does not actually drag or impede particles, but still somehow shares its mass with them."

"the Higgs field ... shares its mass with [particles of matter]"

Now the Higgs field has mass.

Aether has mass.

Matter is condensations of aether.

[mpc755]

'Concerning CERN: Cliff Burgess on the discovery of the Higgs boson'
http://phys.org/news/2012-07-cern-cliff-burgess-discovery-higgs.html

"At CERN they have just provided the first experimental evidence that this picture of the vacuum having physical properties is right. They did so by exciting a wave in the vacuum, which in their experiment looks like a new type of particle."

At CERN they have just provided the first experimental evidence that this picture of the vacuum having physical properties is right. They did so by exciting a wave in the aether, which in their experiment looks like a new type of particle.

"You can think of the whole picture as an analogy where elementary particles are replaced by fish. Suppose you were interested in the properties of fish and how they move and why some fish move faster than others given the same amount of effort. This would be very hard if you did not understand what water was. In order to understand properly the motion of fish, you must first also understand the environment through which they move. Now, those who study fish never doubted the existence of water because, unlike the fish, scientists do not live in it. If you were the first to propose that water existed, it might be a harder sell since everyone would take it for granted. The acid test would be to move the water, or to excite a water wave, since that would show that there was something "there" besides just fish. So the radical theoretical proposal is that we are all moving through a medium, and it is the properties of this medium that partially control the behaviour of elementary particles. Again the acid test is to perturb the vacuum and excite a wave in it. This is what the experiments at CERN seem to have done for the very first time."

So it is obvious that we are all moving through the aether, and it is the properties of this aether that partially control the behaviour of elementary particles. Again the acid test is to perturb the aether and excite a wave in it.

Something which is done every time a double slit experiment is performed.