News:

Forum is currently set to Admin Approval for New Members
Pegasus Gofundme website



Main Menu

Aether Displacement

Started by mpc755, June 23, 2012, 08:10:22 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

mpc755

'Plenty of dark matter near the Sun'
http://www.astronomy.com/~/link.aspx?_id=874895de-75ba-46c5-9a39-7d614a94fcf5

What is thought to be a change in the density of the dark matter is the state of displacement of the aether.

robomont

i use to be an a/c tech and come up with the theory that there is no such thing as an absolute vacuum.if this is true then a hydrogen atom should be able to expand forever.but what is inside?my theory i a bottomless pit.eventually the higgs will be split in half using double slit.etc.into infinity.
the question to ask is what is nature.the particles all want to be atoms.whether the atom is ripped apart down to the higgs or pyled onto till we have universes.the normal state everything eventually reverts back to atom state.
ive never been much for rules.
being me has its priviledges.

Dumbledore

mpc755

Quote from: robomont on August 13, 2012, 08:20:16 AM
i use to be an a/c tech and come up with the theory that there is no such thing as an absolute vacuum.if this is true then a hydrogen atom should be able to expand forever.but what is inside?my theory i a bottomless pit.eventually the higgs will be split in half using double slit.etc.into infinity.
the question to ask is what is nature.the particles all want to be atoms.whether the atom is ripped apart down to the higgs or pyled onto till we have universes.the normal state everything eventually reverts back to atom state.

Aether has mass.

Particles of matter are condensations of aether.

When a nuclear bomb explodes matter evaporates into aether. The evaporation is energy. Mass is conserved.

robomont

can you mathematically show your theory in a "theory of everything" equation?
ive never been much for rules.
being me has its priviledges.

Dumbledore

mpc755

Quote from: robomont on August 13, 2012, 02:01:12 PM
can you mathematically show your theory in a "theory of everything" equation?

The mathematics already exist in general relativity and de Broglie's wave mechanics.

What I have figured out is what Einstein was referring to as the state of the ether and what de Broglie referred to as the energetic contact with a hidden medium.

'Ether and the Theory of Relativity by Albert Einstein'
http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Extras/Einstein_ether.html

"the state of the [ether] is at every place determined by connections with the matter and the state of the ether in neighbouring places, ... disregarding the causes which condition its state."

The state of the aether at every place determined by connections with the matter and the state of the aether in neighboring places is the state of displacement of the aether.

'Interpretation of quantum mechanics by the double solution theory - Louis de BROGLIE'
http://aflb.ensmp.fr/AFLB-classiques/aflb124p001.pdf

"any particle, even isolated, has to be imagined as in continuous "energetic contact" with a hidden medium"

The "energetic contact" is the state of displacement of the aether.

mpc755

'An Extended Dynamical Equation of Motion, Phase Dependency and Inertial Backreaction'
http://arxiv.org/abs/1208.3458

"we provide further evidence of the "fluidic" nature of space itself. This "back-reaction" is quantified by the tendency of angular momentum flux threading across a surface."

"When a system is subject to a sudden change of velocity or direction of motion, there appears an induction force that opposes such a change. This induction force is related to the inertia of bodies. The previous discussion implies that a nonuniform motion of a body that is under observation from a frame of reference (inertial or noninertial), undergoes real physical changes due to the intrinsic properties of the physical vacuum, its polarizability and backreaction inductive term. The inductive term can be identi ed with the Berry's geometric phase acquired over the course of a cycle, when the system is subjected to cyclic adiabatic processes. As for the electromagnetic eld, the inductive e ect is local and referred to absolute space, apparently countering Mach's viewpoint [10]. This work reveals a new concept of unity among the fundamental physics that govern classical mechanics and electrodynamics, from macroscopic to microscopic scales."

What the article refers to as "back-reaction" is the displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward matter.

mpc755

The Milky Way's halo is the state of displacement of the aether.

Curved spacetime is the state of displacement of the aether.

The Milky Way's halo is curved spacetime.

The following is an image of the state displacement of the aether.

The following is an image of curved spacetime.


Eighthman

I'd like a physics expert to answer two questions of mine about the idea of aether:

It seems to me that the whole notion of virtual particles creates an aether, a medium in space.

There is such a thing as antenna resistance or radiation resistance in RF design - normally about 318 ohms in free space. If something is resisting, how could an aether not exist?

Littleenki

Quote from: Eighthman on September 08, 2012, 02:46:05 PM
I'd like a physics expert to answer two questions of mine about the idea of aether:

It seems to me that the whole notion of virtual particles creates an aether, a medium in space.

There is such a thing as antenna resistance or radiation resistance in RF design - normally about 318 ohms in free space. If something is resisting, how could an aether not exist?

Gold for that question, 8th, and put on your helmet, it may get a bit bumpy!

Cheers!
Hermetically sealed, for your protection

mpc755

Quote from: Eighthman on September 08, 2012, 02:46:05 PM
I'd like a physics expert to answer two questions of mine about the idea of aether:

It seems to me that the whole notion of virtual particles creates an aether, a medium in space.

There is such a thing as antenna resistance or radiation resistance in RF design - normally about 318 ohms in free space. If something is resisting, how could an aether not exist?

There are no such things as virtual particles. Virtual particles are more of the absurd nonsense made up by mainstream physicists because they are unable to understand aether has mass and physically occupies three dimensional space.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casimir_effect#Vacuum_energy

"a "field" in physics may be envisioned as if space were filled with interconnected vibrating balls and springs, and the strength of the field can be visualized as the displacement of a ball from its rest position"

A 'field' in physics is space filled with aether and the strength of the field is the displacement of the aether from its rest position.

Each of the plates in the Casimir effect displace the aether. The displaced aether which exists between the plates is pushing back toward each of the plates which causes the aether displaced by each of the plates which exists between the plates to offset. This aether is more at rest than the aether which is displaced by the plates which encompasses the plates. The reduced force associated with the aether which exists between the plates along with the displaced aether which encompasses the plates which is pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward the plates causes the plates to be forced together.

What occurs physically in nature in the Casimir effect is the same phenomenon as gravity.

"It is ironic that Einstein's most creative work, the general theory of relativity, should boil down to conceptualizing space as a medium when his original premise [in special relativity] was that no such medium existed [..] The word 'ether' has extremely negative connotations in theoretical physics because of its past association with opposition to relativity. This is unfortunate because, stripped of these connotations, it rather nicely captures the way most physicists actually think about the vacuum. . . . Relativity actually says nothing about the existence or nonexistence of matter pervading the universe, only that any such matter must have relativistic symmetry. [..] It turns out that such matter exists. About the time relativity was becoming accepted, studies of radioactivity began showing that the empty vacuum of space had spectroscopic structure similar to that of ordinary quantum solids and fluids. Subsequent studies with large particle accelerators have now led us to understand that space is more like a piece of window glass than ideal Newtonian emptiness. It is filled with 'stuff' that is normally transparent but can be made visible by hitting it sufficiently hard to knock out a part. The modern concept of the vacuum of space, confirmed every day by experiment, is a relativistic ether. But we do not call it this because it is taboo." - Robert B. Laughlin, Nobel Laureate in Physics, endowed chair in physics, Stanford University

mpc755

'A principle of relativity for quantum theory'
http://arxiv.org/abs/1209.3887

"The main motivation to try to formulate a new theory according to the above principle is that, as far as we know, the most plausible proposal for a source of dark energy is the assumption of a "cosmic aether" permeating all space whose origin is unknown."

'Was the universe born spinning?'
http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/46688

"The universe was born spinning and continues to do so around a preferred axis"

The Universe spins around a preferred axis because the Universe is, or the local Universe we exist in is in, a jet; a larger version of a black hole polar jet.

'Mysterious Cosmic 'Dark Flow' Tracked Deeper into Universe'
http://www.nasa.gov/centers/goddard/news/releases/2010/10-023.html

'The clusters appear to be moving along a line extending from our solar system toward Centaurus/Hydra, but the direction of this motion is less certain. Evidence indicates that the clusters are headed outward along this path, away from Earth, but the team cannot yet rule out the opposite flow. "We detect motion along this axis, but right now our data cannot state as strongly as we'd like whether the clusters are coming or going," Kashlinsky said.'

The clusters are headed along this path because the Universe is, or the local Universe we exist in is in, a jet.

The following is an image analogous of the Universal jet.

http://aether.lbl.gov/image_all.html

The reason for the 'expansion' of the universe is the continual emission of aether into the Universal jet. Three dimensional space associated with the Universe itself is not expanding. What we see in our telescopes is the matter associated with the Universe moving outward and away from the Universal jet emission point. In the image above, '1st Stars' is where aether condenses into matter.

Dark energy is aether emitted into the Universal jet.

It's not the Big Bang; it's the Big Ongoing.

IRCyborg

I'd like to say a big 'Thank You!' to the O.P. of this thread, as they linked to a wonderful speech from Einstein that goes virtually unnoticed by the mainstream science folks.

Knowledge of the Aether is too liberating to keep the sheep confined to the man-made caves and TV sets.  If folks realized, (and soon they shall). that our embodiment were but an illusion painted upon the Aethereal canvas, the time measured until full on guv-mental overthrow could be meted in mere milliseconds...or just a few 'h' units if you've made friends with Max.

mpc755

Quote from: IRCyborg on September 24, 2012, 06:50:08 AM
I'd like to say a big 'Thank You!' to the O.P. of this thread, as they linked to a wonderful speech from Einstein that goes virtually unnoticed by the mainstream science folks.

Knowledge of the Aether is too liberating to keep the sheep confined to the man-made caves and TV sets.  If folks realized, (and soon they shall). that our embodiment were but an illusion painted upon the Aethereal canvas, the time measured until full on guv-mental overthrow could be meted in mere milliseconds...or just a few 'h' units if you've made friends with Max.

"Doth not this aethereal medium in passing out of water, glass, crystal, and other compact and dense bodies in empty spaces, grow denser and denser by degrees, and by that means refract the rays of light not in a point, but by bending them gradually in curve lines? ...Is not this medium much rarer within the dense bodies of the Sun, stars, planets and comets, than in the empty celestial space between them? And in passing from them to great distances, doth it not grow denser and denser perpetually, and thereby cause the gravity of those great bodies towards one another, and of their parts towards the bodies; every body endeavouring to go from the denser parts of the medium towards the rarer?" – Newton

Newton is referring to the state of displacement of the aether.

The aether does not grow denser and denser. The aether is, or behaves similar to, a supersolid. However, Newton is correct, displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward matter is gravity.

Maxwell's displacement current is a physical displacement of the aether.

Einstein defined the state of the aether as determined by its connections with the matter and the state of the aether in neighboring places. This is the state of displacement of the aether.

de Broglie described a particle, even isolated, as in energetic contact with a hidden medium. de Broglie was describing a particle's displacement of the aether. The displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward the particle is the energetic contact.

Aether has mass and physically occupies three dimensional space. There is no such thing as non-baryonic dark matter not anchored to matter.

Matter moves through and displaces the aether.

Displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward matter is gravity.

A moving particle has an associated aether displacement wave. In a double slit experiment the particle travels through a single slit and the associated aether wave through both.

The Milky Way's halo is the state of displacement of the aether.

The Milky Way's halo is what Einstein referred to as curved spacetime.

Everything is with respect to the state of the aether in which it exists, including the rate at which atomic clocks tick. This is why the speed of light is always measured to be 'c'.

Curved spacetime is displaced aether.

mpc755

'Dark Matter Core Defies Explanation in NASA Hubble Image'
http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2012/mar/HQ_12-068_Hubble_Dark_Core.html

"This technique revealed the dark matter in Abell 520 had collected into a "dark core," containing far fewer galaxies than would be expected if the dark matter and galaxies were anchored together. Most of the galaxies apparently have sailed far away from the collision. "This result is a puzzle," said astronomer James Jee of the University of California in Davis, lead author of paper about the results available online in The Astrophysical Journal. "Dark matter is not behaving as predicted, and it's not obviously clear what is going on. It is difficult to explain this Hubble observation with the current theories of galaxy formation and dark matter.""

The dark matter core does not defy explanation. The dark matter core is not a puzzle. The dark matter core is not difficult to explain. It is obviously clear what is going on.

Non-baryonic dark matter and galaxies are not anchored together. There is no such thing as non-baryonic dark matter. Matter moves through and displaces the aether.

Aether has mass.

An objects resistance to acceleration is the force of the displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward the object.

Inertial mass is the mass of an object as it is accelerated with respect to the state of the aether in which it exists. The object displaces the aether as it moves through the aether. Since it is accelerating the force exerted by the displaced aether toward and throughout the object is not equally applied to the object.

Gravitational mass is the force exerted by the displaced aether toward and throughout an object. When you are standing on the surface of the Earth the aether displaced by the Earth is pushing down and exerting inward pressure toward you.

Both are the same phenomenon. Both are discussing the displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward an object.

Relativistic mass is the mass of the object and the mass of the aether connected to and neighboring the object which is displaced by the object. The faster an object is moving with respect to the state of the aether in which it exists the more the object displaces the aether the greater the relativistic mass of the object.

mpc755

The Universe, or our local Universe, is a larger version of one of these.



Dark energy is aether emitted into the Universal jet.

It's not the Big Bang; it's the Big Ongoing.