NASA Federal Lawsuit: Does NASA "Promote Religion Masquerading as Science?

[undo11]

Something will head in your direction. Can't say nobody warned you.  Linda

are you threatening me?

[Linda Brown]

Absolutely not.   Linda

[undo11]

As I recall Undo.... not many places in the Bible supported women either.

odd though isn't it, that the one place it does support women, et.al, in the teachings of jesus christ, who an entire religion was formed around, and who are now being accused of things like lying thru their teeth to hide something that might prove their religion is false, i mean what else could it be?  why is no one in the thread, other than me, willing to address the bizarre way the guy approached his case?   

[Pimander]

NOTE TO MEMBERS: Those of you who wish to discuss evidence for and against an alleged NASA cover-up of evidence of ET life do not despair.  I will split this topic in the next 24 hours into two topics.  One for discussion of the religious aspect and one for the part most of our members will be interested in.

I apologise to the many members who are here to discuss everything other than religion.  Perhaps I should have realised what would potentially happen. 

[Linda Brown]

Undo,

Many of us understand how passionate you are about this subject but it is making you BLIND to other issues. And when you are Blind.....you are vunerable.  I am sure that you can work that out yourself. Or not... actually.... not my problem.... how you respond to things is YOUR responsibility.

I shouldn't have to say any more..... other than others here want to talk about the case about NASA withholding evidence of alien encounters. Period.  Linda

[undo11]

i have the power to go back and remove my posts. you can do likewise, if you want to remove my line of questioning and commentary.  don't know how you could truthfully discuss the topic of a case predicated on statements that 1) there are no ets in the bible and 2) that christians and jews at nasa are deliberately hiding the information, and still consider this topic a fact finding mission. only fact i see it finding is that people are willing to ignore the big ogre staring them in the eye, to see the fly on the wall across the street. 

how you can discuss his lawsuit without actually addressing its contents, is beyond me.  this thread is a troll thread, designed to cause arguments such as evidenced in this thread, all over the internet.

i'm thinking it's a psyop of some kind, and i don't personally appreciate it. 

[Pimander]

No, I will leave all of our posts as they are.  I may change the title of the thread slightly is all and I have no problem with you continuing your "discussion" here.  I agree that the religious aspect is relevant but our members are primarily interested in other material.

I may also copy posts related to the non-religious aspect to another thread - probably with a similar opening post to this one - so they can be discussed on their own merit because they have been buried here.

[undo11]

I apologise to the many members who are here to discuss everything other than religion.  Perhaps I should have realised what would potentially happen. 

why bring up a case that is predicated on religion and then complain when a person of the religion in question asks why it was necessary for the guy to even bring religion into it, in the first place? you're trolling the forum with this because you don't want people to even address the premise of his lawsuit! you want his argument to be ignored.  WHAT

you're not making any sense.

[Linda Brown]

That was a good move Pimander. Thank you for that. Linda

[undo11]

un-freakin-believable.

[Linda Brown]

There is nothing wrong with splitting the discussion Undo... that way you can spend better detailed time on discussions that are not at all interesting to some of us. Having both discussions running parallel would only be beneficial.

Unless you have a reason for wanting to maintain it on this path, neglecting the other?? 

Linda

[undo11]

No, I will leave all of our posts as they are.  I may change the title of the thread slightly is all and I have no problem with you continuing your "discussion" here.  I agree that the religious aspect is relevant but our members are primarily interested in other material.

I may also copy posts related to the non-religious aspect to another thread - probably with a similar opening post to this one - so they can be discussed on their own merit because they have been buried here.

what other material could it be?  the only material in the dang lawsuit is that christians and jews are hiding data because the bible doesn't say anything about ETs, both premises of which are complete falsehoods.

[Pimander]

you're not making any sense.

I am to everyone else reading this lol

I am happy for a discussion to continue about any aspect of this...

[undo11]

no pimander, i'm not an idiot.  this entire thing has been one big photo op to insult me as much as possible and watch me squirm. 

[Pimander]

If you have any personal issues with me then this is not the place for it.  I like to do my laundry in private.