BRING ON THE TROLLS

[ArMaP]

I run XP - but it likes to crash when heavily loaded.

VIrtualDub and Avidemux are lightweights.

[robomont]

well theres two voice volunteers.
any ideas on what the first doc will be?
do we move forward?

[Pimander]

If you want to make media, you need to do one of the following.

1. Present something new.

2. Present something in a new or better way.

SO what would you want to cover?

[sky otter]

ok..what are the odds...?

Watch 'Thank You, Hater!': A Tribute to Internet Trolls by Clever Pie and Isabel Fay
She's like the Mary Poppins of YouTube!

By Eliot Glazer

[zorgon]

as long as he doesnt wear his medieval stuff on camera. 

Why not? That's when I look my best and get the most attention

[zorgon]

1. Present something new.

Tough one... nothing new seems to be popping up. All my sources are just in rehash mode

2. ... or better way.

better way would be good... like Luna Cognita style videos... but it doesn't have to be on conspiracy necessarily

here is one made by Brotherthebig  first attempt but even ArMaP and seeker get mention

SO what would you want to cover?

Well I would love to do a CRITTER video   but that one should take some time to interview other critter believers (there are a lot)

A Navy space command thread video using only the verified stuff and let viewers fill in the extrapolations. That we we don't get into Navy doo doo's and might actually get support LOL get NAVY recruitment ads

That one should also take time and planning to do it right  and should be copyright safe as its all public domain.

A photo tour of the solar system using NASA imagery like the Fountains on Enceladus... HDD pics showing the weird stuff and maybe drop in the good anomalies like that metal box on asteroid eros

[Pimander]

A Navy space command thread video using only the verified stuff and let viewers fill in the extrapolations. That we we don't get into Navy doo doo's and might actually get support LOL get NAVY recruitment ads

That one should also take time and planning to do it right  and should be copyright safe as its all public domain.

You would need to get Kerry or Bills permission to use Camelot's Gary McKinnon video.  We'd better give them some good publicity.

[A51Watcher]

I LOVE to play with trolls.

Me too. 

Hones My skills and sharpens My presentation.  Adds to My repertoire of arguments...

100% correct.



It also adds to my butterfly collection  -




Location: My butterfly collection
Mood: To the point

Bring on the trolls!

Yummy!

[The Seeker]

Z, I will do voice over or narrate if needed; been 30 years since my radio days but I will give it a shot    but then you have heard me first hand...

seeker

[robomont]

z, i like your idea.
people arent burnt out on that story yet
as far as i know theres only nova.
there is still lotsa ground that can be covered.
compared to something like rendalsham forest which has been rehashed to the point ,who knows whats goin on.

[Shasta56]

What happens when actual trolls show up and start wanting "A Piece of the Action," ala Star Trek?  Just because one of them hasn't smacked you upside the head yet, doesn't mean they aren't there.  People didn't there were still panthers along the Verdrigris in oklhoma till they herthe screams.  I so nee to.go back there.  I need to feel the majik of the area.  I don't want to meet whater david Scott met on the cemetery grounds south of town.  I felt its presencse for months aftreward.

My own take on thingsi s that I'm not ready to die .. I would like to se  my cats safeley into the care of Bast.  I'd like some time with my husband, and I'd like to see Cami out of diapers.  She says maybe when she's in college,so it might be awhile.

Shasta

[zorgon]

compared to something like rendalsham forest which has been rehashed to the point ,who knows whats goin on.

Actually Rendalsham forest we can do a live interview with the head cheese.

[Pimander]

Actually Rendalsham forest we can do a live interview with the head cheese.

You mean Halt?

The Halt Affidavit

In June 2010, retired Colonel Charles Halt signed a notarized affidavit, in which he again summarized what had happened, then stated he believed the event to be extraterrestrial and it had been covered up by both the US and UK:

    "I believe the objects that I saw at close quarter were extraterrestrial in origin and that the security services of both the United States and the United Kingdom have attempted—both then and now—to subvert the significance of what occurred at Rendlesham Forest and RAF Bentwaters by the use of well-practiced methods of disinformation."

Halt also dismissed claims that he and his men had confused a UFO with a lighthouse beam:

   

While in Rendlesham Forest, our security team observed a light that looked like a large eye, red in color, moving through the trees. After a few minutes this object began dripping something that looked like molten metal. A short while later it broke into several smaller, white-colored objects which flew away in all directions. Claims by skeptics that this was merely a sweeping beam from a distant lighthouse are unfounded; we could see the unknown light and the lighthouse simultaneously. The latter was 35 to 40-degrees off where all of this was happening.

[22][23]

Contradictions between this affidavit and the facts as recorded at the time in Halt's memo and tape recording have been pointed out.[24]

In 2010 base commander Colonel Ted Conrad provided a statement about the incident to Dr David Clarke of Sheffield Hallam University, UFO adviser to the UK National Archives. Conrad stated that "We saw nothing that resembled Lieutenant Colonel Halt's descriptions either in the sky or on the ground." and that "We had people in position to validate Halt's narrative, but none of them could." In an interview, Conrad, criticized Halt for the claims in his affidavit, saying "he should be ashamed and embarrassed by his allegation that his country and England both conspired to deceive their citizens over this issue. He knows better." Conrad also disputed the testimony of Sergeant Jim Penniston, who claimed to have touched an alien spacecraft; he said that he interviewed Penniston at the time and he had not mentioned any such occurrence. Conrad also suggested that the entire incident might have been a hoax.[25] [26]

Why does David Clarke automatically believe Conrad?  Because it supports his pre-conceived position.  There are supporting witnesses and Conrad is either mistaken or lying.

[Littleenki]

On Rendlesham..just words against words, witness heresay against debunkers from the military..repeated interviews may expose lies or mistakes in repeating the story, but they will never find any more truth to the matter unless Halt is hiding some evidence like photographs.

So it comes down to who does one believe..the military or the witnesses?

[Pimander]

So it comes down to who does one believe..the military or the witnesses?

well, some of the witnesses are military.  The witnesses were there so there is no question about who to believe, surely?