Dr Eugene Podkletnov Anti-Gravity Scientist gives Rare Interview

[PLAYSWITHMACHINES]

Linda:
I meant that i had read somewhere in your father's notebooks that he questioned the commonly-held theory that gravity waves propagated at the speed of light.

My theory is that gravity is not bound by Relativity, and may well travel much faster than light, Tesla said as much also, and i am beginning to see why.

It was, therefore, no great surprise when i read Podkletnov's work, and i too, am eager to see what Paul LaViolette has to say.....
PWM

[Linda Brown]

I was just nine when I asked my Dad about Einsteins theories and how it was that he thought that nothing could go faster than the speed of light.

I was leading a fat Welsh Mountain Pony at the time and had been riding pretty hard, bareback... Mike had to be " cooled down" before I put him out in his pasture . Dad had just come in from Washington and been dropped off by Dr. Sarbacher.... Dad had walked out to join me and we slowly walked and talked about the fact that Einstein had just died... and what his theories actually meant.

Watch how Dad got his point across to me... Remember... I was just nine years old and interested in HORSES not science! I was a challenge for him I think!

I write this better in " The Good-Bye Man" but....here is a rephrasing.... He asked me how fast I thought Mike could run. I remember quoting him some figure, maybe 25 mph.... downhill I considered... with me riding bareback... some sort of response like that. He told me that Mike would represent the speed of light. And that Einstein was saying that nothing could go faster than Mike could run.... but then he turned to me and simply said..." But sweetie.... the Creator has a stableful of thoroughbreds that NEVER GO SLOWER THAN THE SPEED OF LIGHT.

That made perfect sense to me then and it still does.
Linda

[Amaterasu]

Luke,

Got an answer from Dr. LaViolette:

My view is that in most cases gravitational disturbances propagate at the speed of light, i.e., like when a mass moves from one place to another.  Van Flandern's claim that gravity propagates superluminally is flawed.  His conclusions were based on the assumption that gravity involves a mechanical impact of little bullets.

On the other hand gravitational shocks associated with electric shock discharges travel superluminally because the shock propels the ether forward in the direction of gravity wave travel.  This is why Podkletnov gets the results he does.  This interpretation of Podkletnov's beam and the Obolensky experiment is presented in Chapter 6 of my book Secrets of Antigravity Propulsion
(etheric.com/LaVioletteBooks/Book-Secrets.html).

Also in Subquantum Kinetics I theorize that quantum interconnectedness propagates spin information superluminally because electrogravitic soliton beams develop between particles, these being formed by the mutual interference of superluminal pulsations occurring near the centers of each subatomic particle.

Best regards,

Paul LaViolette

Linda,

I love the way Your dad explained the superluminal particles.  I loved it when I read TGM, and it sounded just as good here.  [smile]

[Linda Brown]

How wonderful it is that Dr. LaViolette has answered the question though. I really appreaciate that even though it might take me awhile to understand what he is actually saying here... I just don't have the "handle" on the terminology that scientists would automatically have.

"On the other hand gravitational shocks associated with electric shock discharges travel superluminally because the shock propels the ether forward in the direction of gravity wave travel."

  I have the strangest urge here to just say.... its just faster when you " go with the flow" but of course that is being rudely simplistic!!!

Also in Subquantum Kinetics I theorize that quantum interconnectedness propagates spin information superluminally because electrogravitic soliton beams develop between particles, these being formed by the mutual interference of superluminal pulsations occurring near the centers of each subatomic particle.

And I definitely have to read your book Dr. LaViolette because as simple as I know that sounds to you.... I got dumped off of this pony pretty quickly! I am familiar with the phrase " Quantum Entanglement". Is that what is meant here too?

Because I theorize that quantum interconnectedness propagates spin information superluminally because electrogravitic soliton beams develop between particles,

I will try to figure out what you have actually said here by myself but I wonder what is meant by " quantum interconnectedness propagates spin information"

What do you mean by " spin information" particularly?

superluminally because electrogravitic soliton beams develop between particles

Electrogravitic soliton beams develop between particles??? I truly do not understand that. As I said... I have so much to learn!

Thank you for responding. Linda

[PLAYSWITHMACHINES]

Thank you, Amy, for communicating this, it does answer some of my questions, and while i myself am having difficulty understanding the terminology, i can see what he's getting at.

There must be a 'threshold energy level' for superluminal gravity, and i think T.T. knew this, certainly the 'improved' Marx generator used by Podkletnov was modified to give an extremely high voltage gradient, (or a very short spark in laymans terms). The quicker the change in voltage over time, the more pronounced the effect.

The real problem, then, is one of ensuring a continued thrust in the form of a stream of EG shocks, operating at a very high frequency, possibly using microwave feedback, like project Skyvault perhaps?

Astronomers are taught to calculate gravitational effects (over interstellar distances) as being instantaneous, yet they never ask 'how can this be?'

[Amaterasu]

Anything I can do to help.  Dr. LaViolette again ignored My invite, so I'm guessing We will not be seeing Him here.

[PLAYSWITHMACHINES]

It's not a problem, he's probably lurking

IF i had a reputation of any kind, I would be hesitant about joining forums, you never know who's listening, i wouldn't want to stick my neck out too far...

Luckily, i have no reputation and nothing to lose, so i can say what i want.

He did give us an nswer of sorts, and i am satisfied with it, if he sees something that he wouls feel needs to be corrected, he will contact us, i am sure...

[Littleenki]

It's not a problem, he's probably lurking

IF i had a reputation of any kind, I would be hesitant about joining forums, you never know who's listening, i wouldn't want to stick my neck out too far...

Luckily, i have no reputation and nothing to lose, so i can say what i want.

He did give us an nswer of sorts, and i am satisfied with it, if he sees something that he wouls feel needs to be corrected, he will contact us, i am sure...

I agree, PWM, as he gave a ton of info in that short reply!
Gravitational waves are just there, so to visualize them travelling isnt necessary, finding the way to attach to them and ride them is though, so thanks immensely Dr L. it is an honor to read those personal words of yours.
I will be trying to gather all of the meaning in that post tonight, and thats a good read for a Sunday evening!
It sounds like youve got the best handle on what was said there, though, Luke, so go get 'em!
I think when Linda got thrown from the pony, we landed in the same pile, as Im a bit lost, too:D
Still thinkin bout those neutrinos......
Littleenki

[PLAYSWITHMACHINES]

Too much credit for a humble armchair scientist like me

Chapter 6 is deep, and it shares something with Bearden's analysis, and also something from String theory.

'Energy' has 2 components, an amplitude, or 'how much'.
And it has information, or 'what kind', 'when' etc
So does mass, but that's another thread in itself.

The 'amplitude' is a vector, and can only propagate at relatively low speeds, depending on the medium etc.
The 'information' is scalar, and is not limited in speed.

The 'information' can travel instantly to another place/dimension, making use of the locally present energy/mass when it gets there. I say 'when' but it takes no time at all.
Very much like Hobbit's description of the 'memory field'.
A neutrino will be expected to depart, travel, & arrive, according to coordinates dictated by the field.

T.T. Brown seems to have been fully engaged in looking for the source to disturbances in the EG field, which he theorised may be coming from the galactic centre, and should therefore have a natural explanation.
I think that is what kept him busy, rather than the practical applications of his discoveries, which had already been taken over by the military.

Am i right, Linda? (about your father, i mean)

[Littleenki]

Too much credit for a humble armchair scientist like me

Chapter 6 is deep, and it shares something with Bearden's analysis, and also something from String theory.

'Energy' has 2 components, an amplitude, or 'how much'.
And it has information, or 'what kind', 'when' etc
So does mass, but that's another thread in itself.

The 'amplitude' is a vector, and can only propagate at relatively low speeds, depending on the medium etc.
The 'information' is scalar, and is not limited in speed.

The 'information' can travel instantly to another place/dimension, making use of the locally present energy/mass when it gets there. I say 'when' but it takes no time at all.
Very much like Hobbit's description of the 'memory field'.
A neutrino will be expected to depart, travel, & arrive, according to coordinates dictated by the field.

T.T. Brown seems to have been fully engaged in looking for the source to disturbances in the EG field, which he theorised may be coming from the galactic centre, and should therefore have a natural explanation.
I think that is what kept him busy, rather than the practical applications of his discoveries, which had already been taken over by the military.

Am i right, Linda? (about your father, i mean)

Ive seen that armchair, and it's full of knowledge! PWM youre right on again!
I like to envision the neutrinos as a roadmap or gps, and what I think linda's dad was also wondering was where do they come from, and where do they go back to. If we follow the neutrinos through their progression in our observable world we may find they are like following a criminal back to his lair, and when we get to the lair, well, it probably will be the center of our galaxy.

I feel they are showing us how to "ride the field" that exists through everything, and I also feel they will be ultimately found to be the interstate across space, when we devise a way to mimic their flow, instead of trying to "catch" them.

I could be way off, but hey, didnt the Wright brothers build a few flops first?

Cheers!
Littleenki

[Linda Brown]

My Dad had a strange concept of what he called " Ashtray Products"

Not many people understood what he meant by that.... but almost every solid technical device and concept that he uncovered he considered an ashtray Product" compared to what he was REALLY after and saw very early in his work.

In the twenties and thirties he understood that he could make hang an instrument and .... against all of the current " laws of physics".... it would develop movement. Normally most would have concentrated on refining that new propulsion principle.... but he saw something else at the same time.....  he saw that the "movement"..... was varied depending on certain times of the day or the month...and it seemed to have a pattern. That fascinated him.

What that was and what it represented became the prime investigation for him......and when that happened he honed his activities in ways that were not totally understood. Even now.

You hit it  when you said this  PWM

T.T. Brown seems to have been fully engaged in looking for the source to disturbances in the EG field, which he theorised may be coming from the galactic centre, and should therefore have a natural explanation.
I think that is what kept him busy, rather than the practical applications of his discoveries, which had already been taken over by the military.

That search " kept him busy" for the rest of his life...You have missed something though in your last sentence..... practical applications... which had been taken over by the military? Yes... some of his " ashtray products" I believe were handed off to the military. I believe I was there when the system which finally was developed for the B2 was handed off to Northrop in 1967.... ( The strange meeting at RAND in Santa Monica).... After years and years of working with the " fan" I came home after that meeting and Dad said that I should consider starting my own life away from the lab... that the project was being closed down.

details here    http://www.smashwords.com/books/view/49963

  Now, many of you would have thought that I would have felt crushed but actually I was like a bird who had noticed suddenly that my cage door was open. BAM! I was GONE!

you say " taken over by the military" and I can vouch for that in that one instance.... Curtis LeMay himself was spending time with us that summer.....(he even changed a light bulb over my desk for me which is something I will never EVER forget....and also my embarrassment later at realizing that the businessmen standing with him.... one was McNamara..... in 1967.... I should have recognized him but sadly.... did not.....Funny now looking back.....the gentleman just shook his head as the man some had called " Iron Pants LeMay" climbed up on a rickety office chair.... ( on rollers yet) to replace that light bulb. It was Daddy he was doing it for..not really me... I was just sort of an invisible fixture in the lab....LeMay followed Dad around like a fawning puppy.... which again I found unusual.  That November meetings were being held there at RAND and with Floyd Odlum.....for those who have done their homework... maybe more dots will rise to the surface. What was going on was extremely high level and VERY military so you are right in assuming what you have.

But there is something going on UNDER that... something that Dad considered even more important.
The variations..... communications....he eventually called it the " nervous system of the universe" and I believe that he understood that it could be used for other beings to communicate with those who saw what it was.  That.... the " military" never saw.

"Ride the field?" As good a description as any Littleenki!  Linda

[PLAYSWITHMACHINES]

Good, i'm just trying to keep it all on track.

I think they saw the potential in those 'ashtray' products, they could not release any of it, even as 'toys'. It would mean giving away the same secrets as were being developed for the bomber.

Once i have some time & more equipment set up, i will also start looking for those cosmic signals, along with other things.

It seems to me we are closing some gaps here & there, your research is phenominal, Linda, i barely have time to read it all.
But what is important is that others, who also have some info, will read it.
It's a fascinating story, i bet Hollywood will beat a path to your door soon

[Littleenki]

"Ride the field?" As good a description as any Littleenki!  Linda

Hey, Linda, Im getting my surfboard ready, and my electroscope, too, PWM!
I do say surf it, because that approaching wave feels like it's about to crest, and I want to have that board waxed up for the occasion!
LE

[kdog]

Very interesting stuff.

I have been going through the videos,but I am not done yet.

I found this interesting link associated with the videos.

http://www.americanantigravity.com/

Great stuff!

This video is a must,describing the physics of anti-gravity.