Farside buildings

[johnlear]

For John...from a photo 58N 158W...... A few highlighted structures I've found...Some apparent some not so..But interesting just the same....

Excellent. Excellent. Excellent. You have an eye to catch the buildings. This particular video represents a lot of work. More photos coming.

[Sgt.Rocknroll]

Thanks John, i also uploaded it to 'OUR' site but i don't know if it made it or not. Funny thing though, as I watched the replay on youtube, i saw a whole bunch of stuff I missed! Guess I'll have to re-visit this photo again.
I increased the dpi from 600 to 2000, then scaled it up 2 times. I might do something different next time. Btw did you get my last email where i revealed something to you? Just checking. Anyway can't wait to get some more stuff from you...As always ...Peace... Rock... (lol)

[Sgt.Rocknroll]

[Sgt.Rocknroll]

This is V13H-1. Just wanted to post some outlines of a few things I think I see. This is a work in progress because there is so much there.
See my other videos go to:

http://sergentrocknroll.blogspot.com/

[Sgt.Rocknroll]

V-13H-1 CONTINUED...

[zerocd]

You do great work Sarge. Always help me reset my eyes. So many interesting shapes. I wonder if we will ever see better resolutions for themoon in our lifetime.

I see one foot resolution photos for Mars, and the LRO is capable of 30cm per pixel, but then we see that 1 meter is what's available. Why is that?
(rhetorical)

[Sgt.Rocknroll]

Thanks for the kudos...it's always appreciated....I couldn't agree more about the resolution....it's the 'we've been there done that' attitude.

[johnlear]

V-13H-1 CONTINUED...

Wow! John, another masterpiece. Its amazing how you find so many artifacts!

Can you please highlight the 'refinery' outlined in yellow?

Again, FANTASTIC!!!!



By johnlear at 2012-05-06

[Somamech]

Liking it a lot Sarge! 

[Sgt.Rocknroll]

Somamech, thank you.

John, thanks a bunch,,,I'll see what I can do...
(keep em' coming if ya got more..)

[1Worldwatcher]

Hi John and all.
I am ver impressed with this compete thread so far, a lot of info. to be digested for sure, especially for you Sgt.RockandRoll!! very talented to say the least with your software. I have studied Mechanical Engineering and was introduced to AutoCad back in the early 1980's, has advanced for sure.
I have a photo of a few thing's I would like to offer for observation and translation. I woul dhave had many more, but had a crash and those are now gone, but managed to retrieve a few of some potential importance.

this first one is of a supposed "Bridge" though I am not sure it is a bridge as depicted, the actual location is listed at the bottom of the photo for locating original if this one is to rough for analysis.



This next one is of a supposed "Star City" it does not have the actual lunar location associated with it, but I am sure John has ran across it a few times.



This one is of a supposed "Ancient Structure Remains" it does have some info on it and once again, John has more than likely the exact location of it. The thing that makes this so odd to mee is it's right angle configurations, not readily made by any form's of natural causes. May have location associated with emblazened number in center of the collague of photo's, not sure.



This is a side by side I rendered of the "Obilesk on the Moon" I pain stakingly drew all the artifacts by hand, but the original is there for the reassesing of this photo, was widely discussed anomoly.



This next one is a satelite shot of "Lunar rectangular Object" once again for location, John probably knows the exact locale of this, what appears to be a structure that is a "Building" .



Same thing zoomed in natural color:



Now enhanced for structural visibility:



this one was titled 144Cafe, not sure what that means, but a very wide view and original in it's format.



I have others I can share, but this is enough seeing how Sgt. has enough on his plate at any given time.
Well, I hope these contribute to the Moon base theories, I have been awakened to these thing's with help from Mr. Lear just as many have been.
Thanks for the Thread John, and your excellent contribution Sgt. it is a fascinating topic..

1Worldwatcher

[Sgt.Rocknroll]

Thanks 1Worldwatcher, it's appreciated. I've been using Cad software since 1979. When I got out of the Army I went to a technical school to learn Process Piping. I had drafting in high school in the 60's and the tech school helped me reaquaint myself with drafting. Of course this was all board drafting, 'spreadin' lead' as we use to call it. The first job I applied for after school was Cad Drafting on the Auto-trol AD380 system. It was a large mainframe system using CRT'S. The industry started using Autocad and Microstation on pc's in the early 80's and I've been doing that ever since. (For John: one of the first 3d models I ever did was a model of a Lear Jet!)..lol....

anyway, I have a copy of AS16-121-19438..it's pretty low res, only 72 dpi...I see the bridge though, but it's kind of blurry.

The 'Star City' I have seen before, but I would like to know what the original file name is so I can search and download an original.

I have the 'LA on the Moon' photo and it's on my list of things to do.

The Cafe144 is very interesting and I would like to get the original file name so I can also search and download it.

Once again, Thanks to everyone for the Kudo's.... I just find this so interesting and I'm amazed when I start search these photos, just how much stuff is sitting there in plain site. Just glancing at a photo is not good enough. Some of the stuff John has turned me on to, at first search I couldn't see anything. But with a little determination and understanding from my wife (lol)..and a few hours, things just seem to appear to me.  I usually have to go back again and again to a photo.
Anyway enough about that...
Glad everyone likes the work...
8)Peace.

[Sgt.Rocknroll]

Well guys here's what I think is a Crane Structure on 111-85M, which I got from John...
It's only a small part of what I think is a large mining area.....There'll be more to follow on this photo...just wanted to share and see what you guys think....Peace

[rdunk]

Hey Sgt.Rocknroll, thanks again for your effort. Some of it is a little hard to see, until you are able to pinpoint I for us.

I have wondered whether you ever switch between black vs white display screens. Sometimes I have wondered if maybe the "powers that be" might do that with the photos, before they are released, just to make things look different. I do that frequently, and sometimes, the different screen can bring out some details that were not easily seeable with the other screen. One situation when I do that is when the photo seems to have so many "bulging" round mounds - which when the display is changed, these mounds change to craters, and the entire landscape look is changed.

One of the recent photo postings above, by 1Worldwatcher is like that. it photo of "Star City" has many such mounds, and other raised features. When I go to the darker screen, and get the changes with the craters, and etc., to me, what is there does look more natural - more like could be some type of possible city. Of course, I am not much of a Moon person yet, so what do I know?

Just wondering! 

[Sgt.Rocknroll]

Thanks for the reply Rdunk, it's appreciated.

As far as changing the color of my monitor screen, no that doesn't help me. Here's what I do.
I first try to get the original file. Usually people copy stuff off of a website and try to look at it, but the resolution is usually crappy and probably at 70 dpi. Or they've copied it and then hi-lighted areas they think they see and then re-save it and that adds to the problem.

Once I get an original file I load it in a software package called "Zoner photo studio". It a free photo managing package that also has a real good editor with all kinds of different effects. It's free just google it.

If I'm lucky, the photo might be 300 dpi. I usually bump up the dpi to 1200 or 1500 depending on the effect. I'm looking for that Goldilocks area where the pixels are not to messed up.
I also sharpen up the resolution a little but not too much. Again the Goldilocks effect.

I then adjust the photo with a Gradient Map effect to lighten or darken the photo..just depends on the photo.

I then scan the photo looking for areas of interest. I also rotate the photo every 90 deg or so and look at the photo from a different perspective. Nasa and others have intentionally, I think, released photos upside down or reversed just to throw you off.

And that's it...that's all the modifications I  do. The rest is painstakingly scanning and re-scanning a photo...Sometimes I'll take some time off and come back and look at it with a fresh set of eyes...

Peace