Farside buildings

[1Worldwatcher]

ArMap

I guess you could be right with the technologies used here on Earth for satellite imaging, but with the new Lunar satellites being sent to get better resolutions and topography of the lunar surface, you would think they could or have gotten technologies to amass structural information and formations of ridge lines, craters and other easily facilitated information by now. After all "The Moon is colored, right?"

Sgt.

LOL "Obviously!!" Ha ha ha ha....Too funny my friend. 

rdunk

Thanks for the link, I have to agree there is some kind of mental self absorption when it comes too die hard skepticism, but, as myself being an atheist, I am assuming they are going by what they "Think they know" kind of dead reckoning of sorts. Though I think my religious interpretations are far more constituted than straight out skeptical denial, they may very well be one and the same as far as over all out come too cause and effect. 

Interesting skeptics website for sure. WWW has got it all covered!! LOL

1WW

[Pimander]

Hello folks.

So, 43 pages in, do we have an image that most of you agree is a building or not?

[zorgon]

A lot of skeptics (and sceptics ) use the word Pareidolia a lot... in fact they flog it to death...  but I have another word that in my opinion describes these skeptics to a tee...

Prosopagnosia

This is the opposite of Pareidolia It is the INABILITY to recognize shapes 

Skeptics will argue that we see faces in clouds and everything else, but that these faces are merely our ability to see form in everything. But what if there is another reason? What if we see these faces because the faces are really there?

Natives have talked about Nature Spirits for thousands of years. What if the faces we see in Nature are really there, an expression of some unknown entity? I have spent years collecting these 'spirits'  And quite frankly I pity the skeptic who's eyes and mind cannot see what I see...

Have a look at this one... I call these images  "The Watchers"







I have found that every really good storm will have a watcher appear 

[ArMaP]

I guess you could be right with the technologies used here on Earth for satellite imaging, but with the new Lunar satellites being sent to get better resolutions and topography of the lunar surface, you would think they could or have gotten technologies to amass structural information and formations of ridge lines, craters and other easily facilitated information by now. After all "The Moon is colored, right?"

Sorry, I don't understand what you mean by that. 

[ArMaP]

Skeptics will argue that we see faces in clouds and everything else, but that these faces are merely our ability to see form in everything. But what if there is another reason? What if we see these faces because the faces are really there?

The problem with faces is that humans are really "wired" to recognise faces, even where there is none, like this one.
Also, what we recognise as a face is something very simple, we just need two points and a line in the right positions to see a face.

So, while I think seeing faces is usually a case of pareidolia, I don't think that seeing mining equipment, buildings and factories is just pareidolia.

[1Worldwatcher]

Sorry, I don't understand what you mean by that. 

I was pertaining to such things as thermal distance imaging, High and low altitude satellite discrepancy evaluated photos or images. With in all the technologies being used, "Don't we have a Lunar Orbiter that supplies topographical information for terrain discrepancies?" i.e. South America with forset covered terrain showing feasible areas for ancient civilization possibilities and locations? (Ancient cities and dwellings on satellite/Radar.)
Heck, I find it useful to take a image to my simple paint and invert the image colors, this pulls out a lot of what isn't being seen as well. Believe it or not, I do have a few pictures of what seems to be ancient remnants of structures on the moon, but can't post due to my PC problems, and I am sorry for that, but it looks very convincing to me that there was more than 'Natural Forces' at work for them to be so obvious, but who knows for sure, I may be wrong.

1WW

[zorgon]

The problem with faces is that humans are really "wired" to recognise faces, even where there is none, like this one.

But see that is my point YOU say there is no face there... and I say maybe there is



Just like this apparition of the Fiery Horse of the Apocalypse. 



But hey no worries  we still love ya

[zorgon]

Hello folks.
So, 43 pages in, do we have an image that most of you agree is a building or not?

Nope no buildings NASA nuked them all. Only way we will get this sorted is sign on with Bigelow and get our own camera up there.

[zorgon]

And the structures on Luna base are hard to spot because they did a lot of THIS 

[1Worldwatcher]

Zorgon

I can see the faces and the Fiery horse as well.....LOL Though I am a free lance artist and was enrolled for Mechanical Engineering as well, so, may be the artsy-fartsy thing with in my brain!!! LOL

Bunnies in the cloud recognition is the way I have always categorized this effect, but, I do believe there are thing's with in the lunar anomalies that shouldn't be there and aren't as malleable as cloud formations. Ever changing as clouds are, the surface of the moon isn't so forgivable for explanations.

Like the Pic's and video 'Z' pretty cool for sure. I am really into Native American religion for the stories, and you are correct, they have been speaking of them much longer than other religions have been around.

1WW

[ArMaP]

Heck, I find it useful to take a image to my simple paint and invert the image colors, this pulls out a lot of what isn't being seen as well.

I never understood that, I always see the same things, either in positive or in negative, inverting the colours doesn't change the difference in tones that makes them more or less noticeable.

Believe it or not, I do have a few pictures of what seems to be ancient remnants of structures on the moon, but can't post due to my PC problems, and I am sorry for that, but it looks very convincing to me that there was more than 'Natural Forces' at work for them to be so obvious, but who knows for sure, I may be wrong.

I can wait.

[ArMaP]

But see that is my point YOU say there is no face there... and I say maybe there is

No, I don't say that there is no face, I said "even if there isn't a face".

Also, that depends on the definition of "face" (I know, some people don't like definitions, but that's how I work); if we say that a smiley has a face then those clouds have a face.

And yes, I see them, and the horse.

[thorfourwinds]

Greetings Esteemed Member, oops, GloMod ArMaP:

OK, now that we have your attention, we have always wondered about these photos and seriously would like your explanation of the 'natural forces' at work here on the surface of the moon.

Unless, of course, there might be another explanation of these 'anomalies' and the Zorgmeister is right again and "Robert the Big" has a hand in his pocket.   

Thank you for your time and consideration.

[ArMaP]

OK, now that we have your attention, we have always wondered about these photos and seriously would like your explanation of the 'natural forces' at work here on the surface of the moon.

They look like lava canals (or whatever those things are called), places where lava once flowed.

[Pimander]

They look like lava canals (or whatever those things are called), places where lava once flowed.

That is the official explanation.  They do look like lava (or more likely magma) flows to me.  My opinion is based on my knowledge of Geology which I studied at A Level only.

It is interesting that the flows are visible on the surface. If they are magma flows (magma flows UNDERGROUND) then there has been erosion which led to them being exposed at the surface.  What process could have done this on a planet without liquid water or enough atmosphere for wind?