Clementine images

[deuem]

Z, There's another Living Moon Web Site ? My net says I am on it now. I have to log in dirrect or forget it. I knew about these mock ups and all the Disney connections a long time ago. And Disney even re-designed the space suits to make them look better on camera. I think they got paid 1 million dollars for the Moon globe.

Thanks for the update on the big moon photo. It was from another mission.

I guess that doing searches here does not include the front page stuff. I have never run into it yet. Besides, I thought all the good stuff was in here....We're here! Thats what it says outside!

Maybe you should double them up as threads so we can find them easy. I doubt if anyone except yourself is leaving the forum to do that. I admit, I am not. I think I briefed it once on the way in and got tossed of the net and let it go...If we have to leave the forum to find it, I don't think that will happen often! You see internal links all the time, Why no external links? Easy, we are all here, past the gate....That's the surface and we live in the core. It's bright out there.......

Deuem

[ArMaP]

You 'suspect?"  LOL  Zorgon is shaking his head wondering if anyone even reads Pegasus material





The picture above right shows the sphere after modeling work. Pretty impressive eh? Notice how background is in the dark. Remove that bloke from the picture and you could EASILY pass this photo as being taken by the Apollo command module circling the Moon.

It couldn't, it does not have the same detail as the photos.

[Sgt.Rocknroll]

Sarge, I know, I agree with you. I have found every type of blur they have. Real and made up.

My bottom line question still is.  "What do we do about it"  Occupy NASA? Area 51? Without the originals or new originals that have not been worked what does everyone do? Maybe in 1.8 million pictures they missed one? But I doubt it. Maybe the Chinese will release New ones that are real. I doubt it. it would change every country in the world. Knowing if there was something going on up there, even better if it was not ours. Would "Rocknroll" the world off its foundation. Would they want to do that? I don't think so. Every religion and every economy would halt and need to be re-invented. It would crash everything. We are so well trained now it would confuse the world to stop.

I think that if there is anything there they have had 50 years to get rid of it, place it under camo or bring it inside. The Chinese might find nothing. It is easy to fool a camera. They have done that since WW1. It is harder to fool termal or radar. Maybe we are looking at the wrong things? What is it the hardest thing to fool and look there. The military does that.. Rock, what are we missing here?

Deuem

What do we do about it? lol...well nothing of course....they'll release them when they're damn good and ready...I believe at some point in time, TPTB, will release what they think you should see for they're purposes....

What are they suppose to say then? 'Hey guys we've been lying to you all these years and spending cajillions of your money to hide what WE think you DON't need to see, but now through the kindness of our hearts and an overwhelming sense of shame for lying to you, we're coming clean with what's on the Moon"?....

The Chinese, Japanese, Indians will and ARE doing the same thing. And believe me, the US has already informed them EXACTLY whats up there...this is all just a publicity stunt for the masses....

I read recently that Nasa and a bunch of students plan to grow veggies on the moon.....lol

Also the Japanese want a giant solar panel around the moon to generate energy because nuclear reactors are really, really dangerous...lol...(but will have to restart a few reactors till we get this built built and in place)....

What do WE do?...just keep looking to satisfy our own curiosity and have fun while doing it....

Peace
Rock...

[Elvis Hendrix]

"What do WE do?...just keep looking to satisfy our own curiosity and have fun while doing it...."

Yup That sounds about right to me .

[Sgt.Rocknroll]

Well, I'm set to receive Clementine Photos, if anyone has some....plenty of room...

[Elvis Hendrix]

This is from JP Skipper from his moonanomaly site. Ive been trying to find 1.5 clementine images and every link takes you to the 2.0 cos 1.5 is no more, but here is a couple to peruse. Il keep poking around.
Elvis



DOCUMENTATION (added 2/15/2010)

The military's Clementine Lunar Browser (CLIB) version 1.5 has been "retired" and the new "improved" version 2.0 data that replaces it now conveniently (for secrecy) does not contain the discovery evidence presented here in this report and it appears that those former discovery sites have been altered in the 2.0 data to sanitize them away. Therefore, to facilitate verification and prove that the anomalous discoveries were in fact in the older 1.5 science data and part of it for 16 years, the links immediately below access the unaltered version 1.5 originals downloaded by this researcher in 2004 and now parked on this website.

http://marsanomalyresearch.com/evidence-reports/2004/069/CLIB-minus35lat-208long-page.htm

http://marsanomalyresearch.com/evidence-reports/2004/069/CLIB-35lat-98long-page.htm

http://marsanomalyresearch.com/evidence-reports/2004/069/CLIB-48lat-157long-page.htm
   


                                     

[Elvis Hendrix]

More from the same.

http://marsanomalyresearch.com/evidence-reports/2004/068/CLIB-68lat-346long-page.htm

http://marsanomalyresearch.com/evidence-reports/2004/068/CLIB-68lat-168long-page.htm

http://marsanomalyresearch.com/evidence-reports/2004/068/CLIB-minus70lat-137long-page.htm

http://marsanomalyresearch.com/evidence-reports/2004/068/CLIB-minus72lat-108long-page.htm

http://marsanomalyresearch.com/evidence-reports/2004/067/CLIB-64lat-265long-page.htm

http://marsanomalyresearch.com/evidence-reports/2004/067/CLIB-70lat-240long-page.htm


                                       

[Sgt.Rocknroll]

Done

[Amaterasu]

You 'suspect?"  LOL  Zorgon is shaking his head wondering if anyone even reads Pegasus material

...

I did not mention My probabilities, z.  I give it a good 98.5% probability, and only "suspect" based on the 1.5% probability that there's nothing to see.

[ArMaP]

Ive been trying to find 1.5 clementine images and every link takes you to the 2.0 cos 1.5 is no more, but here is a couple to peruse. Il keep poking around.
Elvis

I don't think you will find another CLIB version 1.5, unless someone made a copy of the software and of the mosaics used.

Therefore, to facilitate verification and prove that the anomalous discoveries were in fact in the older 1.5 science data and part of it for 16 years, the links immediately below access the unaltered version 1.5 originals downloaded by this researcher in 2004 and now parked on this website.

The above quote from Skipper's site is not correct in one thing: that was not "science data", that was presentation data based on archived science data.

As long as people do not understand that they will be fooled by anyone posting pseudo-anomalies like the ones in those images from the CLIB.

[rdunk]

As long as people do not understand that they will be fooled by anyone posting pseudo-anomalies like the ones in those images from the CLIB

And ArMaP, what is your "proof" of these anomalies being "pseudo", as you suggest?? Just because they are not now in the latest "photos" certainly isn't proof that they weren't there to begin with~~~~~does it??

[ArMaP]

And ArMaP, what is your "proof" of these anomalies being "pseudo", as you suggest??

I have said it several times, those anomalies do not exist in the photos, only on the Image Browser.

Just because they are not now in the latest "photos" certainly isn't proof that they weren't there to begin with~~~~~does it??

They were never in the real photos, only on the image browser.

PS: did you see the anomalies in the image browser or only on images from it?

[zorgon]

I have said it several times, those anomalies do not exist in the photos, only on the Image Browser.

Stop tilting at windmills

[Sgt.Rocknroll]

Yawn... Ho hum

[zorgon]

Question....

There are literally HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS of great images available for the moon and Mars

Yet all that ever happens around here lately  is a rehash of the same old anomalies using other peoples piss poor images

Mike Singh and Exuberant1 spent hours looking for NEW anomalies in many images.  Found a LOT they did  but those really good ones rarely get any attention


So why is no one organizing a committee to systematically search the 160,000 plus available high res Lunar Orbiter photos, or the Mars Global Reconnaisance Orbiter images?  Or the skads of great Rover inmages?

Like THIS one for example?