A Real Extraterrestrial on Mars?

[rdunk]

A Real Extraterrestrial?

Hey everyone, I am presenting for all of us something I found last year while doing research on Mars. I will try post enough information for all of us to develop some thought about what it is or what it isn't. I will relate the facts of what I see in viewing all of the photos in this post and links, and hopefully give enough information so that each of you can likewise come to some conclusion.

I see an ET! I discovered this Extraterrestrial in Mars photos on April 25, 2013.

The location of this discovery is in the Mars Victoria Crater, and ET is seen in the side of St Mary's Cape.

According to the NASA photo data, the photos which depict this ET were taken by Rover Opportunity on Mars Sol days 1212 and 1213.

ET is seen in the same position in 22 different Rover Opportunity Pancam photos, described by JPL as being "super-resolution images", that have allowed scientists to discern.........."!

http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/mer/gallery/all/opportunity_p1212.html

http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/mer/gallery/all/opportunity_p1213.html

Please note: Some of the Sol day images are of other parts of the Cape, and thus do not show the area where the ET sits.

PIA10211 - http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/catalog/PIA10211
   PIA10211 is constructed from a mathematical combination of  "32 different"             
        blue filter images.  This photo is available up to a Full-Res TIFF @ 32MB.

In viewing the ET, we can see the camera angle is to ET's right rear. ET is sitting, with legs seemingly dangling from the knee down. ET's right fore-arm is bent across the leg/knee. We can see ET's right leg from the butt/hip as he sits, and we can see his back, shoulders, and right side-body. And all of that seems to be quite common humanoid features!! BUT from the neck up, wow, just out-of-sight!!!! We can see some sort of neck on top of the shoulders, but above the neck is totally different. Really, the only part above the neck we can see is a semi-triangular/maybe trapezoidal "shaped piece". This could be some boney part of ET's head, or possibly some sort of life-support system piece. There is another anomaly piece nearby that also seems to have a similar head-piece.

I will post an original distance photo, and a high magnification photo, along with links above that have all of the Rover detail Sol day images. In viewing the original distance pics, because of the distance, magnification will be necessary. A shadow cast to the rear of ET does partially interfere with the full visibility of ET in all of the images.   

Now, I have explained what I see, now it is your turn!! I am looking forward to hearing your thoughts!

The original distance photo:



The Magnified photo:

[Sinny]

Sorry to be the first Rdunk, but I see a rock with shadows.

Happy hunting...

[rdunk]

Sorry to be the first Rdunk, but I see a rock with shadows.

Happy hunting...

Thanks Sinny! No need to feel sorry, as you just see what you see. I appreciate your commenting. This is a tough one, simply because of it being taken with long camera shots. And that results in the closer looking magnified images being pixelated. But from the long shots to the mag shots, the ET image pretty much stays the same.

Just for everyone's ability to see this a little better, I had planned to post additional pics with higher mag, and I will do that with one in this reply - more pixelated, but at least the features are more seeable. Again, thanks for your thoughts on this!!


Note: click on the posted pic for the highest mag! And, when one does that, then use the scroll bar at the bottom of the pic to see the ET image.

[ArMaP]

I don't think so, but you probably already expected that.

As those are old photos they are already available on the Analyst's Notebook, so I grabbed one radiometrically corrected image (1p235785390rad85mep2441l2c1) and, applying the default radiometric correction value (30, if I'm not mistaken) in IMG2PNG and resizing the result to 300% I got this.



PS: I tried to make an animated GIF with two images from the left and right cameras, but the images I got didn't exaclty match, as if the rover or the arm had moved a little.

[The Seeker]

what rdunk sees as the backside of a sitting being looks more like a large face of a statue to me; looks especially noticeable in the last image Armap posted...

but that's just me...


seeker

[ArMaP]

If I have the time I will try to make a superresolution image of that area with the radiometrically corrected images.

[rdunk]

Hi ArMaP! Sure, there are a several images of this location on St.Mary;s Cape that just show a jumble of rocks............for some reason?? But 22 of the pics, plus the PIA10211 shows something different, and not a jumble of rocks, the way I see it!

I am not sure what why you are trying to do something different with the images, as those that are available seems to be pretty good to me. And as I noted in the OP, JPL describes these photos as being "super-resolution images, that have allowed scientists to discern.........." - another words, these photos are good enough for the scientific work they have done. So, for me, they should be good enough for use in anomaly search, and thus finding ET, if he is here, which for me he is, as I see it!!

Thanks for your comments!

[rdunk]

what rdunk sees as the backside of a sitting being looks more like a large face of a statue to me; looks especially noticeable in the last image Armap posted...

but that's just me...


seeker

"but that is just me" - and that is what I would like from everyone!! seeker, thanks for the comment. With what I see, ArMaP has used one of the pics that does just show a jumble of rocks. I don't see the ET in his pic either. It is a little strange that some of the pics of the same area are so different?? But most of the images of the specific area on Sol day 1212 and 1213 show the ET image quote clearly (as I see it) - as clearly as clearly goes in these Mars Rover photos, with black shadows, and with pics taken at extreme distance!

[Ellirium113]

None of the aliens I talked to are typically made up of sedimentary deposits so based on that I am going with rock formation. 

[Pimander]

I thought you already posted a thread on this rdunk?  Or is it a similar rock formation... ahem, I mean alien?

[ArMaP]

Hi ArMaP! Sure, there are a several images of this location on St.Mary;s Cape that just show a jumble of rocks............for some reason??

Maybe that area has just a jumble of rocks?

But 22 of the pics, plus the PIA10211 shows something different, and not a jumble of rocks, the way I see it!

I downloaded the 22 photos and will post them as soon as I can.

I am not sure what why you are trying to do something different with the images, as those that are available seems to be pretty good to me.

But, to me, the radiometrically corrected images look much better, I have always said that, and I am not trying to do something different, I just used that image the way it was intended to be used.

And as I noted in the OP, JPL describes these photos as being "super-resolution images, that have allowed scientists to discern.........." - another words, these photos are good enough for the scientific work they have done.

First of all, let me finish that quote: ".....that the rocks at Victoria Crater once represented a large dune field that migrated across this region".

Now, for a question, if you don't mind: do you know what is superresolution?

So, for me, they should be good enough for use in anomaly search, and thus finding ET, if he is here, which for me he is, as I see it!!

If the superresolution panorama was made to get a better idea of the whole area it wouldn't be good for looking at small details, if it was made to get a higher definition, higher quality image (although the original photos had too much noise for that), then yes, it's good for looking at small details.

Thanks for your comments!

You're welcome.

[ArMaP]

I thought you already posted a thread on this rdunk?  Or is it a similar rock formation... ahem, I mean alien?

It's not the same.

[rdunk]

I thought you already posted a thread on this rdunk?  Or is it a similar rock formation... ahem, I mean alien?

Pimander, just for fun, I was using this ET as my avatar several weeks ago. I did make a post of just my avatar pic, with no other info, because I wasn't ready to post the full detail. It was discussed just a little back then.

[astr0144]

E113,

I am not aware of you talking with ETs,

Would be very interested to learn about your experiences ....

None of the aliens I talked to are typically made up of sedimentary deposits so based on that I am going with rock formation.

[rdunk]

ArMaP asked, "Now, for a question, if you don't mind: do you know what is super-resolution"?


No, ArMaP, I don't. I simply assume that if JPL was bragging about it, it must be something better than standard resolution, which is good enough for me. And I just know what I see in the photos we have, and that too is good enough for me!! If you can find better photos, then that would be even better - but better certainly doesn't mean totally different in this case!