Dan Aykroyd explains UFO cover-up on The HuffPost Show

[RUSSO]

Always liked Dan Aykroyd

Last Friday, Dan Aykroyd appeared on the third episode of The Huffington Post's new The HuffPost Show, and among other topics, shared his views on the U.S. Air Force's UFO cover-up and some details about his own UFO sightings.

The conversation turned to UFOs when Hill asked, "I said if I am ever going to meet Dan Aykroyd I am going to ask him about this. You believe in UFOs. Is that right?"

There was a slight hesitation by Aykroyd, and a few giggles from off camera, but Aykroyd headed straight into his answer.
Aykroyd told Hill, "I do. I have seen four, and I can't say that they are alien craft and neither can the Air Force. The Air Force has been very interested in this. They don't deny the existence of these hyperdynamic, super aerodynamic craft. They don't deny."

Although Aykroyd says the Air Force does not deny the existence of alien spacecraft, he explains why he thinks there is a cover-up of that information.

Aykroyd continued, "Their anguish comes in that they can't tell you. They want to tell you anything but that they are extraterrestrial. Any excuse at all, even if they are unknown or unsolved. The Air Force cannot just come out and admit that there are extraterrestrial beings far in advanced of our culture that have built these machines."

Aykroyd also says he thinks that although there is a cover-up, the Air Force really doesn't know much more than the rest of us. He says, "They are very interested in what is going on, but like us, they don't know."

Hill then asked Aykroyd if he was willing to share more information about the UFOs he had seen.
"Two specifically were definitely aerial constructs of some kind," Aykroyd explained. "One of them with a light, and one of them dull gray, and they were structures – one of them going very slow, one of them hovering over me."

As for the other two, Aykroyd continued, "Then there were the two that my wife and friends and I saw – a high altitude sighting many years ago in Martha's vineyard. Two flying side by side. They were at about 100,000 feet up, and they were going fast."

Aykroyd then went on to share the account of one of his drivers. He says the driver used to be a cook at the Air Force's Strategic Air Command. The driver says one day a bunch of guys were gathered around a radar screen watching an object that was traveling at 70,000 miles per hour and performing "whip turns."

"I believe that there are probably many species coming and going and that the Air Force is very interested, but they can't come out and say," says Aykroyd. "Because then you're going to go, 'well wait a minute, the parish priest, the cop on the street, the President — you don't got the power. They've got the power!'"

If that were to happen, Aykroyd says there may be a "complete breakdown of society."

Aykroyd also recommended a book about UFOs and the CIA and FBI by Dr. Bruce Maccabee. The book is titled, The FBI-CIA-UFO Connection: The Hidden UFO Activities of USA Intelligence Agencies, and it reviews documents that Maccabee received via the Freedom of Information Act. Maccabee, a physicist, spent thirty-six years at the Naval Surface Warfare Center.

More Here--> http://www.openminds.tv/dan-aykroyd-explains-ufo-cover-up-on-the-huffpost-show/33221

Dan Aykroyd - Full Interview


Also, if you interested in what he have to say, here is the 2012 full documentary "Dan Aykroyd Unplugged on UFOs"

"Dan Aykroyd Unplugged on UFOs - 2012 (Full Documentary)" explores past and present sightings from around the world with shocking real footage, much of it never before seen, that will leave even the most skeptical viewers scratching their heads. Along with the fascinating collection of stunning eyewitness videos, Aykroyd reveals his own vast knowledge of the strange and paranormal as he explores in detail his views on conspiracy theories, military secrets, and how UFO technology is currently part of our everyday lives.

Interisting to me, maybe for you too.



Ps. Anyway, I'm still waiting for the photographs and tapes from O'Hare UFO airport incident he supposedly claimed to have. Just rumors it seems.

Last question, at 3:05.



http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/08/24/chicago-ohare-ufo-leslie-_n_692515.html

[Just Looking]

Isn't this the man who bought quite a lot of stuff re UFO's but refuses to show it to anyone?

[RUSSO]

Isn't this the man who bought quite a lot of stuff re UFO's but refuses to show it to anyone?

In the last video in my opening post, at 3:05 the guy asks him about it. He tells people told him the footage existed etc. I dont think he ever got one copy in hands tho. If so, i suppose he would show it.

But who knows?

[ArMaP]

I never believe in actors.

[RUSSO]

I never believe in actors.

...and dont like Bob Marley. Got ya 

[Dyna]

I never believe in actors.

Well an actor is just a person with a job acting, they can't all be the same. I just wish people didn't assume they know them by what characters they act. We can't like or dislike these people they are strangers, we can like or dislike their work.

I suppose if he had said he had some photos or information that never appeared he may have been warned not to show them if there really is a reason to keep this all secret.

[ArMaP]

Well an actor is just a person with a job acting, they can't all be the same.

Nobody said they are.

I just wish people didn't assume they know them by what characters they act.

Well, don't assume my opinion is based on the characters any actor has played.

My lack of trust is actors is related to the fact that their work is making people believe in what they say, we can never know when one is acting as him/herself or some character.

We can't like or dislike these people they are strangers, we can like or dislike their work.

I never said a think about liking Dan Aykroid, and what I don't like in Bob Marley is his work, I never met the man.

I suppose if he had said he had some photos or information that never appeared he may have been warned not to show them if there really is a reason to keep this all secret.

Or he may have been paid to say that, that's what he does for a living.

[Dyna]

"We can't like or dislike these people they are strangers, we can like or dislike their work."

I never said a think about liking Dan Aykroid, and what I don't like in Bob Marley is his work, I never met the man.

I know ArMap I just see people say these things all of the time (I love so and so he/she is a wonderful person) I didn't mean all of that for you. sorry.

[zorgon]

Isn't this the man who bought quite a lot of stuff re UFO's but refuses to show it to anyone?

This is one key point that has always bothered me about UFO "whistleblowers"  They claim to have hard evidence but refure to show it or more importantly let anyone else study and confirm it

Dr Lier says he removed Alien implants. He passed away and no one has independently verified these to be alien  and where are they now? He also claimed he had a piece of Roswell... but never let anyone touch it

Cherry Hinkle Source of the Dulce Material (according to John she was his source) says she has a box that can prove it all... but refuses to release it

Bob Lazar says he buried a piece of 115 but refuses to dig it up John Lear says he knows where it is but won't tell me

Phil Schneider shows a piece of Element 142 "Corbomite: in a video. Holds it up as if it was nothing (it would be extremely heavy and likely highly radioactive ) yet NO ONE ever questioned it or asked to look at it

Stanton Friedman has NEVER seen a UFO, Never made it as a Nuclear scientist) no PHD and onlt a couple years at failed jobs before turning UFO 'expert' on the lecture circuit but he says Bob Lazar is a Fraud

100's of supposed UFO crash retrieval and many annual symposiums on these yet never ONE piece of shrapnel to be tested...

Alien stargate Mayan/Aztech stones found in Mexico/Ecuador/Gautamala with no dig site or providence on the stones yet they are touted as fact

On and on it goes  UFOlogist are WORSE at keeping secrets than the supposed Government coverup

[petrus4]

As I've said before, in my mind at this point ufology is basically over, as far as it still being a topic with any real credibility is concerned.  Given that some here will also know that I consider myself an abductee, that may seem extremely strange.

The reason, however, is fairly simply that I think the scene has become completely dominated and saturated by commercialistic con artists, to the point where determining the real validity of anything has become largely impossible.  Ufology these days is a carnival; a cottage industry.  It was not always that way.

Project Camelot was what began the disillusionment process for me, but putting up with Steven Greer's continual nonsense and ultimately not being shown anything substantial as a consequence, was what finished it.  The fade to black at the end of Sirius marked the point where I shook the proverbial dust from my feet.  I can only suspend disbelief for so long, and when a continual stream of profit-motivated bovine fecal matter is my exclusive reward for doing so, eventually I modify my opinion accordingly.  I won't claim that my mind is completely closed at this point, but it isn't much more than ajar.

Mr. Aykroyd is an actor who I have always held in high esteem, particularly given that he has portrayed a number of characters who I am fond of.  If he were to hypothetically read these words, I would tell him that my intent here is not at all to discount his individual experiences, which could well be entirely real.  My reservation is, as mentioned, that there is a sufficient amount of fraud and disinformation now present, that genuine enquiry into the matter has become exceedingly difficult.

[zorgon]

As I've said before, in my mind at this point ufology is basically over, as far as it still being a topic with any real credibility is concerned.  Given that some here will also know that I consider myself an abductee, that may seem extremely strange.

I agree but the abductee phenomena might not be Aliens in Flying Saucers. It may be something more supernatural. Jury is still out on that one for me   But that said I have noticed that the vast majority of these abductiob stories are like UFOs  they are fake and created by people who just want attention, When you dare question them they get violent

I had the same situation with two Astral Travel groups.  Now for background these two groups were Lobsang Rampa followers so I figured these of all groups would be serious

So I went and asked if anyone could pop up to Venus for a look around.  I was serious  I expected some takers. What I got was attacked and kicked off the groups.  The first group said how DARE I question their ability and just booted me  WTF?  the second group the admin wrote me and said much the same thing  but I explained that I was serious and had thought a Rampa board was my best bet to find someone.  After that he told me that the people can't do it on demand  "it just happens at random" and suggested I do it myself.  I told him I came here looking for CONFIRMATION of what I saw  but they still suggested I go away

This has been my problem in recent years and has made me realize that no matter how much I do on the web, I will always find the majority are all wanna be's and SCAM ARTISTS :p

The reason, however, is fairly simply that I think the scene has become completely dominated and saturated by commercialistic con artists, to the point where determining the real validity of anything has become largely impossible.  Ufology these days is a carnival; a cottage industry.  It was not always that way.

Yes and mostly a waste of time. The few reports that have any value are so buried you spend endless hours looking at crap.  I tend to just watch stuff go by on FB to snag the odd good one but what really gets my goat is that the charlatans are getting main stream media exposure and more money,

I just don't have con artist in me  so I starve   It is even hard to get a coffee tip or beer tip on the website   (yeah its on the front page

Project Camelot was what began the disillusionment process for me, but putting up with Steven Greer's continual nonsense and ultimately not being shown anything substantial as a consequence, was what finished it.

Camelot was the one I got all the John Lear info from so in the beginning they were good.  Then they created Project Avalon forum and everything changed  Long story  Henry Deacon aka Arthur aka etc  etc... was supposedly a funder of them but he was a true nut case. Result was John Lear was banned from Avalon and shortly after my stuff was erased and I was banned as well.

Greer same thing  At first I was "Oh wow  finally a real investigation... top people coming forward  Congress will hear this"  Then I discovered that Sgt Karl Wolf was a LIAR and they never retracted the obvious time discrepancy. Carol Rosin supposedly was with von Braun  yet there is ZERO verification of this and she looks like Nancy Hutchinson/Linda Brown/Dr Rauscher type  LOL   She is on FB and I friended her and showed people the state of the art DEW weapons status. Well this pissed her off because she is selling that we have NO space weapons because of her work   Oh really?  Well she deleted my comments and unfriended me.

Cherry Hinkle... SOURCE of the DULCE material. Never heard of her until she went public last year or so on FB. I asked John who the F... she was and he said she is HIS source of everything Dulce related.  She started posting all sorts of crap  most of it obvious and exposed hoaxes and I started to question her, She claims she has a box that would prove Dulce but won't release it.  She finally unfriended me too rather than answer questions

So what to do?  Seems the more I dig the more the old sources are also coming up as scammers.  The only thing I do get verification on is military stuff... all the UFO stuff is so buried in muck you get dirty just looking at it


Sad thing is the same applies to Ancient Alien searches and Free Energy interests.  All these years and nothing solid, just BS Scam artists and endless worthless opinions on the web  and no one can get together and agree on anything''What we have here is a TRUE "Tower of Babble"

My reservation is, as mentioned, that there is a sufficient amount of fraud and disinformation now present, that genuine enquiry into the matter has become exceedingly difficult.

Well I suppose we can think that this is deliberate  Best way to cover up any real stuff is bury it in cow puckies

[RUSSO]

But that said I have noticed that the vast majority of these abductiob stories are like UFOs  they are fake and created by people who just want attention, When you dare question them they get violent

You just need one to be true 

Greer same thing  At first I was "Oh wow  finally a real investigation... top people coming forward  Congress will hear this"  Then I discovered that Sgt Karl Wolf was a LIAR and they never retracted the obvious time discrepancy. Carol Rosin supposedly was with von Braun  yet there is ZERO verification of this and she looks like Nancy Hutchinson/Linda Brown/Dr Rauscher type  LOL   She is on FB and I friended her and showed people the state of the art DEW weapons status. Well this pissed her off because she is selling that we have NO space weapons because of her work   Oh really?  Well she deleted my comments and unfriended me.

Carol Rosin really is a disappointment for me. I thought she really was with von Braun in his last years.

[Pimander]

As I've said before, in my mind at this point ufology is basically over, as far as it still being a topic with any real credibility is concerned.  Given that some here will also know that I consider myself an abductee, that may seem extremely strange.

I don't agree.

The attention seekers, military cover stories and New Ager BS are not credible.  There has still been some good UFO research that is largely ignored on the internet, especially on forums.  ArMaP and Karl12 are aware of some of this work.  I have studied a lot of the material a few years ago.

The real research just isn't sensational enough for people who want easy answers or answers that fit in with their world view.  The media are in the main not interested and New Agers just want Galactic Federation nonsense.  If you want easy answers then don't bother with UFOlogy as there are none.

[zorgon]

If you want easy answers then don't bother with UFOlogy as there are none.

I WANT an easy answer   After 60 years since Roswell, umpteen abductions, hundreds of crashed saucers I think I am entitled to an easy answer...

Show me just ONE dented old obsolete Flying Saucer.  Surely the old prototype reverse engineered ones are in a boneyard somewhere by now 


So yeah I want an easy answer

[Pimander]

I WANT an easy answer   After 60 years since Roswell, umpteen abductions, hundreds of crashed saucers I think I am entitled to an easy answer...

Tough luck!

To me it is obvious that there is a simple reason why there is no easy answer.  Even in that short quote above you have a clue.  I'll try to clarify.

Lets say Roswell has one answer (but may not even be a single incident just to complicate the matter).  Abductions have at least two (possible three or four).  Crashed "saucers" have at least two.  And some of those answers overlap.  Furthermore, if we look at the discussions on ATS or this site, actual Unidentified Flying Objects (i.e. unidentified not "saucers") have a multitude of explanations.  Finally, the most common types of UFO are not even ever seen in space so space anomalies are a separate matter entirely.... 

So one easy answer?  You have to be kidding.  A hopeless task made harder by wrongly putting completely separate phenomena into one category by UFOlogists.  If there really is a secret technology or genuine cover up of inter-dimensional aliens then which of those phenomena are likely relevant?  Very few!