Gravity control

[astr0144]

Thank you for your explanations..

I was still a bit confused when I thought that you earlier referred to the Mirror mag being 4 magnets...

then as you posted that image I was not sure if that suggested that the 4 background magnets related to the BIG WHEEL and the Single foreground Magnet represented the Mirror Magnet !

Then you indicate that you refer  to there being more magnets in pairs of 6..

Does that mean each of those would contain  pairs ...



I agree its been some conversation..and time for some rest..

[vril-ya]

4  bacground magnets are "big wheel", yes.. i have a feeling you are pulling my leg last half of the conversation, but i believe it is not intentionaly, but simply a confusion despite this thing being so extremely simple that it ciuldn't be simpler and clearer even if i tried to confuse it.

Thank you for your explanations..

I was still a bit confused when I thought that you earlier referred to the Mirror mag being 4 magnets...

then as you posted that image I was not sure if that suggested that the 4 background magnets related to the BIG WHEEL and the Single foreground Magnet represented the Mirror Magnet !

Then you indicate that you refer  to there being more magnets in pairs of 6..

Does that mean each of those would contain  pairs ...



I agree its been some conversation..and time for some rest..

[astr0144]

Possibly it was down to a combination of a long session, tiredness, a bit of confusion and my lack of understanding..

I may have got some facts mixed up..

But I think now I understand that the Big Wheel in your image was the 4 magnets and the Mirror magnet was the single one magnet.

BUT when you then said it actually uses MORE magnets and then you refer to say "Only they are stacked together in Pairs of 6"..

Sometimes I have to see something to grasp it..

I do sometimes get mental Blocks on somethings when described by text..

without seeing it close up or maybe as a diagram..

I may envision it in more than one way..

If trying to represent with a simple basic diagram represents the Big Wheel on the left of  as  maybe 4 dots.  or (4 x 0 )

. .     0  0
. .     0  0

and the Mirror magnet represents  to the right of it
(or rep by one dot )  or by the one 0

0   0
                                                  0
0   0 

Big Wheel (4 magnets)          Mirror Magnet (One magnet)
(Shown as 4 x 0 )                 (Shown as 1 x 0 )

When you then say there are more magnets..only stacked together in pairs of 6...

IF we just start with the ONE Mirror Magnet...Does this mean that is a pair of magnets joined closely together.. or is it more joined together ?

so could we say show the SINGLE ONE Mirror Magnet 0 as being actually a pair (Two Magnets Closely joined together appearing as one) or more..

That's my confusion !

4  bacground magnets are "big wheel", yes.. i have a feeling you are pulling my leg last half of the conversation, but i believe it is not intentionaly, but simply a confusion despite this thing being so extremely simple that it ciuldn't be simpler and clearer even if i tried to confuse it.

to image i posted, it actually uses more magnets, only they are stacked together in pairs of 6.

[vril-ya]

no problem.. it simply means that each of 4 big magnets is made of 6 smaller ring magnets stacked together. mirror has 4 stacked together because i only got so much magnets.


i already posted a photo and a link where i bought the magnets, here it is again.

https://www.supermagnete.de/eng/ring-magnets-ferrite/ring-magnet-80mm-x-40mm-x-15mm-ferrite-y35-no-coating_FE-R-80-40-15

Possibly it was down to a combination of a long session, tiredness, a bit of confusion and my lack of understanding..

I may have got some facts mixed up..

But I think now I understand that the Big Wheel in your image was the 4 magnets and the Mirror magnet was the single one magnet.

BUT when you then said it actually uses MORE magnets and then you refer to say "Only they are stacked together in Pairs of 6"..

Sometimes I have to see something to grasp it..

I do sometimes get mental Blocks on somethings when described by text..

without seeing it close up or maybe as a diagram..

I may envision it in more than one way..

If trying to represent with a simple basic diagram represents the Big Wheel on the left of  as  maybe 4 dots.  or (4 x 0 )

. .     0  0
. .     0  0

and the Mirror magnet represents  to the right of it
(or rep by one dot )  or by the one 0

0   0
                                                  0
0   0 

Big Wheel (4 magnets)          Mirror Magnet (One magnet)
(Shown as 4 x 0 )                 (Shown as 1 x 0 )

When you then say there are more magnets..only stacked together in pairs of 6...

IF we just start with the ONE Mirror Magnet...Does this mean that is a pair of magnets joined closely together.. or is it more joined together ?

so could we say show the SINGLE ONE Mirror Magnet 0 as being actually a pair (Two Magnets Closely joined together appearing as one) or more..

That's my confusion !

[vril-ya]

so many speak about oveunity of 150% or 200% like it is something big, this produces overunity factor of 10000% or 20000%, while magnet only motors like muammer yildiz or howard johnson produce infinite overunity factor since there is no need for input energy whatsoever.