Where On Earth Are NASA’s Rovers Sending Pictures From? Devon Island, Canada

[ArMaP]

I know the ones of which you speak, seasonal appearances .. so what did you think about them that was so unpopular? ski tracks for Blue-its ?

As I said, I don't remember what it was, but whatever it was it was something I didn't give much importance, seeing that I forgot about it. 

[funbox]

As I said, I don't remember what it was, but whatever it was it was something I didn't give much importance, seeing that I forgot about it. 

ah not to worry , lay back on your Lillo and drift along in that comfortable middle stream , steady as she goes, no eddies or whirlpools, just easy sailing.


keep an ear out for any large roaring noises though

funbox

[ArMaP]

ah not to worry , lay back on your Lillo and drift along in that comfortable middle stream , steady as she goes, no eddies or whirlpools, just easy sailing.

What's a "lillo"?

As I said in another thread, my opinions are my own, I don't care if they are in "middle of the stream" or not.

[funbox]

What's a "lillo"?

sorry to many L's , im surprise that threw you though

https://www.google.com/#safe=strict&q=inflatable+lilo+argos

As I said in another thread, my opinions are my own, I don't care if they are in "middle of the stream" or not.

good for you, although I still find it fascinating someone so straight  laced , would spend so much time dipping their toes into the fringes . then there's no end to the frivolity of my contemplations

funbox

[ArMaP]

sorry to many L's , im surprise that threw you though

https://www.google.com/#safe=strict&q=inflatable+lilo+argos

I only knew LILO, the Linux Loader, and Lilo from Lilo & Stich (only by name, never watched it)

good for you, although I still find it fascinating someone so straight  laced , would spend so much time dipping their toes into the fringes . then there's no end to the frivolity of my contemplations

As I said before, it depends on the topic. In the topic of space exploration my opinions are mostly the same as the official explanations from the scientists, not from the "public relations" people, but that doesn't mean that I'm not open to other ideas, and the best place to see new ideas is the "fringe" area, where we sure to see new ideas (or recycled old ideas). The fact that I think most (if not all) of those ideas are wrong doesn't mean that I'm think that nobody will ever appear with a different but correct idea/opinion/theory that will become mainstream in the future, as all mainstream ideas were once new.

[funbox]

I only knew LILO, the Linux Loader, and Lilo from Lilo & Stich (only by name, never watched it)
As I said before, it depends on the topic. In the topic of space exploration my opinions are mostly the same as the official explanations from the scientists, not from the "public relations" people, but that doesn't mean that I'm not open to other ideas, and the best place to see new ideas is the "fringe" area, where we sure to see new ideas (or recycled old ideas). The fact that I think most (if not all) of those ideas are wrong doesn't mean that I'm think that nobody will ever appear with a different but correct idea/opinion/theory that will become mainstream in the future, as all mainstream ideas were once new.

so I take it you don't believe we're being visited by advanced alien civilisations then?, now or in the distant past..

or do you ?

funbox

[ArMaP]

so I take it you don't believe we're being visited by advanced alien civilisations then?, now or in the distant past..

I don't think we are or were visited by alien civilisations, as I haven't seen any data that points only to that explanation, and, in case of doubt, I always choose the most simple explanation. 

[funbox]

what was the simple conclusion you arrived at to explain the animal mutilation phenomena? what did you conclude the simple reason for 'exploded nodes' in some crop formations. I take it you are familiar with these subjects

do these phenomena show  symptoms of not so explainable and sometimes bizarre secondary evidence, that when accumulated these evidence's , and under the rules of Occam's razor, point to an unusual but simple answer ?

and what of secondary medical evidence that has accumulated through the years, being familiar with the ufo phenomena im sure I don't need to single any particular case out , no doubt they're like little needles at the back of your mind

funbox

[ArMaP]

what was the simple conclusion you arrived at to explain the animal mutilation phenomena?

None, I never looked much into that subject.

what did you conclude the simple reason for 'exploded nodes' in some crop formations. I take it you are familiar with these subjects

The same as above, I never looked much into it either.

and what of secondary medical evidence that has accumulated through the years, being familiar with the ufo phenomena im sure I don't need to single any particular case out , no doubt they're like little needles at the back of your mind

You do need to single out one particular case, as I don't have the slightest idea of what you have in mind. 

[funbox]

You do need to single out one particular case, as I don't have the slightest idea of what you have in mind. 

ill have a look ,
here's one for you ,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cash-Landrum_incident

funbox

[funbox]

as for animal mutilations

http://www.mufon.com/animal-mutilations

I find it strange that there's no mention of Linda Moulton Howe on the site.. hmmm

but she was a reporter who covered the 80'ss epidemic, a strange harvest

I know you don't like videos , but this one is a classic









my apologies I cannot find part one *found*

as for exploding nodes, this video should explain the difference found between crops circles



all small parts that show a larger pattern , try if you like to use more *fuzzy logic*>> to paint in the links , as a programmer im sure you know what I mean by that

funbox

[ArMaP]

The UFO cases with physical evidences are the best ones, and those that had/have physical effects on the witnesses are the more interesting, but does that really means that they can only be explained by extraterrestrial visitors?

I find it funny that some people like to point out that people should "think outside the box" (I never liked that expression) but appear to see only one explanation for whatever they see they cannot explain.

Yes, there are dozens upon dozens of cases, but saying "it's Aliens" doesn't really explain them, it just replaces one unknown (who were they) with another unknown, seeing that saying "it's Aliens" doesn't really tells us who they were, it's like the "person or persons unknown", it gets nobody closer to the truth.

PS: I didn't watch the videos.

[funbox]

The UFO cases with physical evidences are the best ones, and those that had/have physical effects on the witnesses are the more interesting, but does that really means that they can only be explained by extraterrestrial visitors?

I find it funny that some people like to point out that people should "think outside the box" (I never liked that expression) but appear to see only one explanation for whatever they see they cannot explain.

Yes, there are dozens upon dozens of cases, but saying "it's Aliens" doesn't really explain them, it just replaces one unknown (who were they) with another unknown, seeing that saying "it's Aliens" doesn't really tells us who they were, it's like the "person or persons unknown", it gets nobody closer to the truth.

PS: I didn't watch the videos.

its a case of deductive logic, seeing as you didn't watch the video, im unable to discuss the finer points , or any of the points made in the video. how can you see without viewing the actual video and photographs that where taken of these beasts,

beggars belief

funbox

[ArMaP]

how can you see without viewing the actual video and photographs that where taken of these beasts,

beggars belief

I didn't say I wanted to see.

[funbox]

I find it funny that some people like to point out that people should "think outside the box" (I never liked that expression) but appear to see only one explanation for whatever they see they cannot explain.

how ironic, by your own admission you narrow your field of vision by not paying attention to the fields around you, how are you supposed to see the weave , if your staring at one small patterning of the rug

I never liked the expression either. I think that all things unknown and known cohabit  inside one big box that has the phrase "not to be opened until closing time" written on its exterior/interior

funbox